Window 5 - 2 Laund Park

Key Events:

• 6' Yellow card to Laund Park Philippe Robert
• 7' Window Abdoulaye Ba scores, assisted by Ognyan Georgiev
• 11' Laund Park Pedro Chagas scores, assisted by Nilson Pires
• 27' Window Hyungjoon Eom scores, assisted by Abubakar Sani
• 32' Yellow card to Window Kai Choo
• 49' Yellow card to Window Bruno Rossi
• 58' Window Kai Choo scores, assisted by Bruno Rossi
• 70' Window Kai Choo scores
• 80' Window Abubakar Sani scores, assisted by Hyungjoon Eom
• 86' Yellow card to Window Hyungjoon Eom
• 88' Laund Park Nilson Pires scores

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: Window scored five from an xG of 3, outperforming its chance-quality estimate by two goals. Laund Park scored twice from 0.91 xG, also finishing above its estimate, though its four shots and three on target left little room to make up the difference. The contrast is striking: Laund Park edged possession 53%-47% and completed passes more accurately, but Window produced 13 shots, 11 on target, against four and three. That volume and accuracy help explain the result; Window repeatedly turned possession into attempts, while Laund Park had the ball more often without creating a comparable stream of chances. The five-goal return was better than the home xG forecast, but not a statistical bolt from a clear sky.

The first 27 minutes set the pattern for a match that never stayed level for long: Window struck first, Laund Park replied, and Hyungjoon Eom restored the home lead. After the interval, Kai Choo scored twice and Abubakar Sani added another, stretching the margin to four before Nilson Pires found a late answer. That final goal made the score 5-2, but did not change the shape of the contest. Window had already put the result beyond reach through its much greater shot volume and a second-half burst that Laund Park could not match. The four yellow cards marked a busy disciplinary tally, though neither side had a player sent off. For Window, the performance offered an emphatic win and several decisive contributions; for Laund Park, possession and tidy passing were real but insufficient comforts against an opponent that kept finding the target.