Barret County 0 - 7 Wime Stanley

Key Events:

• 2' Yellow card to Wime Stanley Walter Correia
• 10' Wime Stanley Jorge Vargas scores, assisted by Marcel van Eck
• 25' Wime Stanley Jamal Said scores
• 26' Wime Stanley Marcel van Eck scores, assisted by Jamal Said
• 27' Yellow card to Wime Stanley Jorge Vargas
• 43' Wime Stanley Seungwoo Jeong scores, assisted by Marcel van Eck
• 63' Wime Stanley Jorge Alvez scores, assisted by Jamal Said
• 71' Wime Stanley Seungwoo Jeong scores, assisted by Walter Correia
• 76' Yellow card to Wime Stanley Jorge Alvez
• 79' Wime Stanley Antonio Hernandez scores, assisted by Jorge Vargas
• 88' Yellow card to Barret County Adilson Moreira

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: Barret County recorded 0.61 xG and finished without a goal; Wime Stanley produced 2.86 xG and scored seven. The visitors therefore finished dramatically above the chance-quality estimate, turning 10 shots on target into a scoreline far beyond what their measured opportunities alone would suggest. That is a remarkable conversion day, not a reason to pretend the chances were worth seven goals before they were taken. Barret County had more possession and more corners, but only three shots, which points to the central problem: holding the ball did not translate into meaningful threat. Wime Stanley were much more direct in the useful sense, creating 13 attempts and repeatedly making their attacks count. The second goal arrived at 25 minutes and another followed a minute later; by half-time the visitors had already scored four, leaving the contest with little suspense and a great deal of arithmetic.

• No Barret County players recorded a rating of 7.0 or higher.

The second half did not bring a change of direction. Wime Stanley added goals at 63, 71 and 79 minutes, with Jorge Alvez, Seungwoo Jeong and Antonio Hernandez completing the scoring. Barret County did have more of the ball, more corners and better pass accuracy, but the visitors’ superior shot volume and finishing decided the afternoon. Four yellow cards were shown in total, three to Wime Stanley and one to Barret County; neither side received a red. The 0 - 7 scoreline is emphatic, and the numbers offer a useful distinction: Wime Stanley’s performance created a clear advantage, while their finishing turned that advantage into something exceptional. For Barret County, possession was plentiful; the occasions when it became danger were not.