Match Centre
Shot Breakdown
Alan Elliott to Andrew van Wijk. The event log names a helper; it does not name a body part.
Gazzetta reconstruction from match events — not pitch tracking.
Key Moments
Team Comparison
The ratings desk
Standout performances
Andrew van Wijk*
A standout performer, van Wijk scored twice and assisted once, orchestrating much of Watelphampde’s attacking play.
Florian Marie*
His goal and overall contribution added to the hosts’ offensive momentum.
Carl Powers*
Scored the fourth goal, demonstrating clinical finishing.
Alan Elliott*
Provided the assist for van Wijk’s opener, showing good vision.
Francesco Russo*
Despite a yellow card, he contributed defensively and scored late in the game.
The report
In a commanding display at Division 6 League 3, Watelphampde dominated possession and created numerous scoring opportunities, ultimately running out 5-0 winners over Prudbury. The hosts showcased clinical finishing and tactical discipline, with Andrew van Wijk shining brightest by netting twice and providing an assist. Despite a modest 49% possession, Watelphampde’s 22 shots, 19 on target, underline their offensive intent, while Prudbury struggled to threaten the goal with only 4 shots and a mere 1.01 xG. The match was a showcase of attacking efficiency from Watelphampde and defensive resilience, with the visitors unable to cope with the hosts’ relentless pressure.
Key Events:
- 12' Watelphampde Andrew van Wijk scores, assisted by Alan Elliott
- 18' Yellow card to Prudbury Danilo Vidal
- 19' Watelphampde Florian Marie scores, assisted by Andrew van Wijk
- 39' Watelphampde Andrew van Wijk scores, assisted by Taesuk Chwe
- 49' Watelphampde Carl Powers scores
- 63' Yellow card to Watelphampde Francesco Russo
- 77' Watelphampde Francesco Russo scores
No Prudbury players reached the 7.0+ rating threshold, reflecting their struggles throughout the match.
This match was a demonstration of Watelphampde’s attacking efficiency and tactical discipline, with their high shot accuracy and clinical finishing making the difference. Prudbury’s limited attacking output and inability to convert chances ultimately sealed their fate, as Watelphampde’s dominance was clear from start to finish.