Teley City 3 - 1 Lyminchulwyn

Key Events:

• 17' Yellow card to Teley City Bruno Rossi
• 33' Lyminchulwyn Lindomar Da Silva scores, assisted by Luis Pinto
• 40' Teley City Bruno Rossi scores, assisted by Israel Morales
• 48' Teley City Luca Colombo scores
• 57' Teley City Lindomar Da Silva scores, assisted by Luis Pinto
• 63' Yellow card to Teley City Luca Colombo
• 74' Yellow card to Lyminchulwyn Friedrich Unger
• 83' Yellow card to Lyminchulwyn Lindomar Da Silva

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis

The Gazzetta chance-quality estimate gave Teley City 3.63 xG and Lyminchulwyn 0.36. The hosts scored three, finishing 0.63 below their expected total; Lyminchulwyn scored once from very little, exceeding its estimate by 0.64. That small overperformance made the visitors’ 33rd-minute opener count, but it did not reflect the broader flow of chances: Teley City had 18 shots, 12 on target, while Lyminchulwyn managed one shot, which was on target.

Possession and chance creation went their separate ways. Lyminchulwyn had 53% of the ball, more corners and more dribbles, but the possession did not translate into a second attempt. Teley City were less involved in circulation and far more productive at the sharp end, scoring once before half-time and twice after it. Their xG points to a performance that created enough for the three goals, even if the finishing fell a little short of the opportunities available. The visitors’ goal was a neat return from a meagre chance supply; it was also their only one.

No standout performers rated 7.0 or higher were recorded for either side.

The scoreline records a two-goal margin, and the chance balance suggests Teley City earned it: the hosts had 17 more shots and more than ten times the xG. Still, Lyminchulwyn had enough of the ball to make the match untidy, and its corner count offered several chances to change the shape of the afternoon. Teley City answered the early setback with three goals in 24 minutes, a decisive spell that mattered more than the visitors’ territorial advantages. Four yellow cards were shared evenly, while the fouls were split 13 apiece; the contest found common ground, if not much attacking work from both sides.