Hasing Town 4 - 1 Hexhamsey

Key Events:

• 3' Yellow card to Hasing Town Pedro Guzman
• 12' Hasing Town Ivan Mesa scores, assisted by Ahmed Ahmed
• 46' Hasing Town Norbert Fischer scores, assisted by James Mann
• 50' Hasing Town Norbert Fischer scores, assisted by Ivan Mesa
• 59' Yellow card to Hasing Town Ivan Mesa
• 60' Hexhamsey Michael Brown scores, assisted by Philippe Robert
• 65' Hasing Town Ahmed Ahmed scores, assisted by Gabriel Zambrano

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis

Hasing Town scored four from an xG of 3.73, a modest over-performance that reflects sharp execution rather than a result detached from the chances created. The hosts put 14 of 16 shots on target, an unusually high proportion and a useful explanation for why their possession share of 49% did not prevent them from controlling the more consequential parts of the match. Hexhamsey scored once from 1.57 xG, underperforming that estimate; five shots on target offered some threat, but not enough to match the hosts’ volume or their conversion. The visitors had 51% possession and better pass accuracy, yet those measures brought six corners rather than a second goal. The difference was less about who kept the ball and more about who made the ball’s visits count.

No Hexhamsey players reached a rating of 7.0 or higher.

The sequence after half-time settled the contest quickly: Norbert Fischer scored in the 46th and 50th minutes, and Hexhamsey’s response through Michael Brown four minutes after Ivan Mesa’s caution briefly interrupted the home side’s run without changing its direction. Ahmed Ahmed restored the three-goal margin in the 65th minute. Hasing Town did not monopolise possession, nor did they need to; their accuracy in front of goal gave the match a firmer shape than the possession figures suggested. Two home yellow cards and twelve fouls mark a more physical contribution, while Hexhamsey’s cleaner foul count and passing percentage could not compensate for the gap in shots. A 4-1 scoreline was emphatic, and the numbers support it: Hasing Town made more chances, placed far more attempts on target, and finished with four goals. The visitors had the ball slightly more often; the hosts made better use of the appointment.