Craccring 0 - 7 Foron-Asham Stanley

Key Events:

• 31' Foron-Asham Stanley Luis Viana scores, assisted by Rikardo Jukić
• 34' Foron-Asham Stanley Domingo Araujo scores
• 39' Yellow card to Craccring Philippe Robert
• 51' Foron-Asham Stanley Maarten de Koning scores, assisted by Mijo Tomić
• 57' Foron-Asham Stanley Rikardo Jukić scores, assisted by Bakary N'guessan
• 74' Foron-Asham Stanley Rikardo Jukić scores, assisted by Ivan Perković
• 76' Foron-Asham Stanley Bakary N'guessan scores, assisted by Luis Viana
• 88' Foron-Asham Stanley Ivan Perković scores, assisted by Rikardo Jukić

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: The Gazzetta chance-quality estimate gave Craccring 0.71 xG and Foron-Asham Stanley 4.0. Against those figures, the hosts finished below expectation with no goals, while the visitors scored seven from an already substantial expected return: a striking over-performance, even by the standards of a match that had stopped being close well before the final whistle. The shot count helps explain the imbalance: Foron-Asham Stanley put 15 of 17 attempts on target, while Craccring managed two on target from four. The visitors did not need to dominate possession to apply pressure or produce high-quality finishing; the hosts’ 61% possession and six corners brought no goal in return. Seven goals from four xG points to finishing well beyond the estimate, while the 17 shots and 15 on target show that this was not simply a case of scoring from one or two isolated opportunities.

There was a clear change of scale after the opening goal. Luis Viana struck in the 31st minute, and Domingo Araujo added another three minutes later, giving Foron-Asham Stanley a two-goal lead before the break. After Maarten de Koning made it three in the 51st minute, Rikardo Jukić scored twice and contributed two assists across the visitors’ seven goals. Craccring continued to hold more of the ball, but the numbers tell the less comforting part of that story: four shots, no goals, and a 0 - 7 final score. The visitors’ sharpness made the gap emphatic; the hosts’ possession made it unusually well documented.

No Craccring players recorded a rating of 7.0 or higher.