Sudbridsey 9 - 0 Soudled

Key Events:

• 3' Sudbridsey Haeil Noh scores
• 5' Yellow card to Soudled Lindomar Da Silva
• 9' Sudbridsey Mijo Halilović scores
• 18' Sudbridsey Jaime Cancino scores, assisted by Mijo Halilović
• 21' Yellow card to Sudbridsey Everardo Sanchez
• 39' Yellow card to Soudled Norbert Fischer
• 40' Sudbridsey Jaime Cancino scores, assisted by Mijo Halilović
• 45' Sudbridsey Jaime Cancino scores, assisted by Constantino Lopez
• 62' Sudbridsey Haeil Noh scores, assisted by Everardo Sanchez
• 65' Yellow card to Sudbridsey Jaime Cancino
• 67' Sudbridsey Everardo Sanchez scores, assisted by Haeil Noh
• 68' Yellow card to Soudled Stuart Mitchell
• 71' Sudbridsey Norbert Fischer scores
• 79' Sudbridsey Jaime Cancino scores, assisted by Mijo Halilović

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: Sudbridsey scored nine from an xG of 5.1, outperforming the chance-quality estimate by 3.9 goals. That is a substantial finishing surplus, built on relentless volume and accuracy: 25 shots, 17 on target, and enough pressure to keep the visitors occupied without needing a possession monopoly. Soudled finished with 0.51 xG from just two shots, both on target, but could not turn either into a goal. The 53-47 possession split suggests the hosts’ advantage was less about keeping the ball for its own sake than making their attacks count—and, repeatedly, making the next one count too.

The match was already 3-0 by the 18th minute, with Mijo Halilović contributing a goal and then setting up Jaime Cancino for the third. Cancino finished with four goals, while Halilović’s three assists helped keep the attack moving. Sudbridsey added two more before half-time, then resumed scoring after the break; the late sequence took the total to nine without giving Soudled a way back into the contest. Five yellow cards were shown, but no red cards. In a lopsided result, the restraint of the disciplinary record is one of the smaller numbers that managed to remain small.

• No Soudled players reached a rating of 7.0.

The final 9-0 score was wider than the xG gap alone would predict, but the underlying pattern was emphatic: Sudbridsey produced 23 more shots, and Soudled never found a goal despite putting both efforts on target. The hosts’ finishing exceeded the estimate by a considerable margin; their control of the match, however, was no statistical illusion.