The report
Key Events:
- 23' Yellow card to Warkbury Nathan Da Silva
- 27' Welds Park Michael Turner scores, assisted by Bjarne Pedersen
- 29' Yellow card to Welds Park Ian Hill
- 39' Yellow card to Warkbury Mamadou Kouadio
- 55' Welds Park Ian Hill scores
- 76' Yellow card to Welds Park Eugenio Ribeiro
In terms of expected goals, Welds Park’s 1.68 xG outperformed their actual tally, indicating they created quality chances that they effectively converted. Meanwhile, Warkbury’s 0.51 xG suggests they had limited but potentially dangerous opportunities, with their two shots on target reflecting a clinical finishability but lacking in volume. Welds Park’s slightly higher possession and shot count, combined with their superior xG, highlight their tactical control and efficiency. Welds Park’s ability to create high-quality chances was evident, especially with five shots on target, compared to Warkbury’s two. The disciplined defensive effort from Welds Park, combined with their sharp finishing, ultimately decided the outcome. The match’s tactical ebb and flow, with Welds Park capitalizing on their opportunities, underscores their effectiveness in front of goal despite a balanced possession stat.
No standout performers (rating 7.0+) recorded for either team.
This match demonstrated Welds Park’s clinical edge and tactical discipline, securing a well-earned victory that keeps their league ambitions alive. Despite limited possession, their ability to convert chances and maintain defensive solidity was the key to their success. Warkbury, while competitive, lacked the finishing touch needed to break down Welds Park’s organized backline, and their efforts were ultimately thwarted by the visitors’ sharp counter-attacks. Both sides showed resilience, but Welds Park’s efficiency in front of goal made the difference in this evenly matched contest.
Match Centre
Shot Breakdown
A booking nearby, then Michael Turner for Welds Park. Tension, then arithmetic.
Gazzetta reconstruction from match events — not pitch tracking.
Key Moments
Team Comparison


