Bundston 0 - 7 Casing City

Key Events:

• 4' Casing City Carlos Gonçalves scores, assisted by Edward Ross
• 8' Yellow card to Casing City Yubin Sanka
• 11' Casing City Edward Ross scores, assisted by Jorge Martinez
• 34' Yellow card to Bundston Jorge Alvez
• 43' Casing City Edward Ross scores, assisted by Wilson Correia
• 52' Yellow card to Casing City Rodolfo Lopez
• 55' Casing City Domingos Brito scores, assisted by Wilson Correia
• 59' Casing City Edward Ross scores, assisted by Wilson Correia
• 63' Yellow card to Casing City Jorge Martinez
• 75' Yellow card to Bundston Michael Brown
• 76' Casing City Domingos Brito scores
• 78' Casing City Luis Giraldo scores, assisted by Jorge Martinez

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: Casing City scored seven from 3.35 xG, substantially outperforming the chance-quality estimate; Bundston scored none from 0.11 xG, a return that reflects how little their possession translated into danger. The visitors’ 15 shots, 12 on target and seven goals tell a clear story of direct, effective attacking, with Edward Ross and Wilson Correia central to the supply line. Bundston had 59 per cent possession and seven corners, but managed just one shot, none on target. Possession and pressure are related, though in this case they appear to have met only briefly in the corridor.

No Bundston players recorded a rating of 7.0 or higher.

The match was effectively shaped before the interval: Casing City scored in the fourth minute, added another in the 11th, then struck again at 43'. After the break, the visitors scored four more times, including a three-minute burst from the 76th to the 78th that took the score from 0-6 to 0-7. The five yellow cards were distributed across both sides, but the ledger records no red cards; the contest’s decisive imbalance was in the shooting, not the discipline.

For Bundston, the possession and passing figures offer little comfort beside a single shot and no efforts on target. Their seven corners and 14 dribbles show that they did get forward, but those incursions never became a serious test of Casing City. The visitors, meanwhile, needed less of the ball and made far more of the time they had it. A 7-0 scoreline is emphatic by any reasonable accounting; the only surprise is that the chance estimate suggests Casing City made an already wide margin wider still.