The report
Key Events:
- 7' Thouge Athletic Luis Pinto scores, assisted by Lindomar Da Silva
- 10' Yellow card to Wilderforsham Pedro Chagas
- 22' Thouge Athletic Lindomar Da Silva scores
- 29' Yellow card to Wilderforsham Seungwoo Jeong
- 33' Yellow card to Wilderforsham Nilson Pires
- 39' Wilderforsham Nilson Pires scores, assisted by Philippe Robert
- 44' Yellow card to Thouge Athletic Israel Morales
- 84' Yellow card to Thouge Athletic Weijie Hong
- 90' Thouge Athletic Lindomar Da Silva scores, assisted by Luis Pinto
- 90' Yellow card to Thouge Athletic Xinping Boon
Thouge Athletic’s superior xG of 3.33 compared to Wilderforsham’s 0.49 reflected their clear attacking intent and efficiency. The visitors created a flurry of opportunities, with 12 shots on target, and their two goals from Lindomar Da Silva and Luis Pinto were well-earned. Wilderforsham, on the other hand, managed only three shots, with their solitary goal coming from Nilson Pires after a neat assist from Philippe Robert. Despite a possession split of 51% to 49%, the home side struggled to convert their limited chances into goals, and the tactical disparity was evident in the shot and shot-on-target counts. Thouge Athletic’s disciplined pressing and sharp finishing ultimately made the difference, even as both teams exchanged fouls and yellow cards in a fiercely contested match.
The game was punctuated by tactical discipline and moments of individual brilliance, notably from Thouge Athletic’s standout players. The visitors’ attacking duo of Lindomar Da Silva and Luis Pinto combined to devastating effect, with Da Silva scoring twice and providing an assist, earning him a match rating of 8.1. Pinto also contributed a goal and an assist, rating 7.3. Wilderforsham’s Nilson Pires scored a crucial goal but lacked the same impact overall. The game’s physicality was reflected in the number of fouls and yellow cards, with both sides showing commitment without crossing into reckless territory. As the final whistle blew, the statistics and the scoreline confirmed that Thouge Athletic deserved their victory, their clinical finishing contrasting sharply with Wilderforsham’s limited attacking output.
Match Statistics:
Possession: Wilderforsham 51% - Thouge Athletic 49% Shots: Wilderforsham 3 (On Target: 1) - Thouge Athletic 15 (On Target: 12) Corners: Wilderforsham 5 - Thouge Athletic 9 Fouls: Wilderforsham 9 - Thouge Athletic 7 Yellow Cards: Wilderforsham 3 - Thouge Athletic 3 Red Cards: 0 - 0 Dribbles: Wilderforsham 8 - Thouge Athletic 8 Pass Accuracy: Wilderforsham 83% - Thouge Athletic 84% Tackles: Both sides 10
The match was a testament to the importance of clinical finishing and tactical discipline. While Wilderforsham showed resilience and a decent share of possession, they lacked the cutting edge to trouble the visitors’ goal consistently. Thouge Athletic’s ability to convert their chances, combined with disciplined defending and effective pressing, secured their victory. The game’s physicality and the presence of yellow cards reflected the competitive nature of Division 8 League 75, but ultimately, the visitors’ attacking prowess was the decisive factor in this well-fought encounter.
The ratings desk
Standout performances
Nilson Pires*
Scored a vital goal but was otherwise limited in influence.
Philippe Robert*
Provided the assist for Nilson Pires and helped in build-up play.
Pedro Chagas*
Picked up a yellow card early but kept the home side competitive.
Seungwoo Jeong*
Showed effort in midfield, though lacked cutting edge.
Lindomar Da Silva*
Two goals and one assist; the standout performer of the match.
Luis Pinto*
Scored and assisted, orchestrating much of the visitors’ attack.
Israel Morales*
Defensively diligent but picked up a yellow card.
Weijie Hong*
Contributed defensively and received a late yellow.
Xinping Boon*
Worked tirelessly but was booked late in the game.
Match Centre
Shot Breakdown
Lindomar Da Silva to Luis Pinto. The event log names a helper; it does not name a body part.
Gazzetta reconstruction from match events — not pitch tracking.
Key Moments
Team Comparison


