The report
The game saw Fereet United creating an expected goals (xG) of 3.23, indicating they were well worth their four goals, while Maingtonhal registered an xG of just 1.06, reflecting their limited attacking threat. The hosts had 17 shots, with 10 on target, demonstrating their offensive intent, while the visitors managed only 6 shots, with 3 on target. Fereet United’s ability to convert chances was evident, especially in the second half, where their relentless pressing and quick transitions kept Maingtonhal on the back foot. The visitors’ possession was higher at 55%, but their passing accuracy was slightly better at 85%, yet they failed to translate this into meaningful scoring opportunities. Tactical discipline from Fereet United and their efficient use of space proved decisive, as they maintained pressure and exploited defensive lapses.
In the end, Fereet United’s clinical finishing and disciplined structure earned them a comprehensive victory. The team’s defensive organization kept Maingtonhal at bay, with the visitors unable to find a breakthrough despite their possession advantage. The match demonstrated that possession alone does not guarantee success; sharpness in front of goal and tactical execution are crucial. The result boosts Fereet United’s confidence, while Maingtonhal will need to reassess their attacking approach moving forward.
Event Timeline: 35' - Fereet United scores 44' - Fereet United scores 52' - Yellow card to Fereet United an unnamed player 80' - Fereet United scores 88' - Fereet United scores
Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: Fereet United’s xG of 3.23 aligns closely with their four goals, indicating efficient finishing and tactical sharpness. Their attacking plays were well-crafted, with multiple opportunities converted into goals. Conversely, Maingtonhal’s xG of 1.06 underscores their limited threat in front of goal, with only a few clear chances created. The disparity in xG reflects the dominance of Fereet United in both possession and attacking quality, confirming their deserved victory.
No standout performers (rating 7.0+) recorded.
Match Centre
Shot Breakdown
an unnamed player to an unnamed player. The event log names a helper; it does not name a body part.
Gazzetta reconstruction from match events — not pitch tracking.
Key Moments
Team Comparison


