Seadney County 1 - 4 Jarbrinst Athletic

Key Events:

• 30' Jarbrinst Athletic Michel Lemoine scores
• 30' Yellow card to Seadney County Enver Bešić
• 37' Yellow card to Seadney County Fernando Lagos
• 40' Jarbrinst Athletic Allan Carroll scores, assisted by Michel Lemoine
• 45' Jarbrinst Athletic Pedro Chagas scores, assisted by Seungwoo Jeong
• 45' Seadney County Luis Pinto scores, assisted by Raymond Davies
• 46' Yellow card to Jarbrinst Athletic Jorge Alvez
• 51' Yellow card to Seadney County Bruno Rossi
• 51' Yellow card to Jarbrinst Athletic Pedro Chagas
• 74' Jarbrinst Athletic Jorge Alvez scores, assisted by Phillip Lewis
• 80' Yellow card to Seadney County Davor Karić

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: The Gazzetta chance-quality estimate put Seadney County at 1.57 xG and Jarbrinst Athletic at 1.58, a near-even reading that sits well apart from the 1-4 final score. Seadney County scored once from its 1.57 xG, while Jarbrinst Athletic scored four from 1.58: the visitors substantially outperformed the estimate, and the hosts fell short of theirs. That gap points to a match decided less by the overall volume or quality of chances than by the visitors’ finishing and their ability to turn opportunities into goals. Seadney County managed eight shots, five on target; Jarbrinst Athletic had six shots, all on target. The visitors’ perfect accuracy gives the scoreline a practical explanation, even if it does not make the xG numbers any less surprised.

For Seadney County, Luis Pinto’s 45th-minute goal made the score 3-1 at the break, arriving just after Pedro Chagas had extended the visitors’ lead. It offered a response, but not a reset: Jarbrinst Athletic restored its three-goal advantage through Jorge Alvez in the 74th minute. The timing of the two first-half goals around the interval made an already busy passage feel rather crowded, while four yellow cards for Seadney County marked a difficult afternoon in which the hosts could not convert their share of chances into a closer result.

The supporting numbers describe a competitive match in possession and several basic measures: the clubs were separated by two percentage points of possession, and each had five corners, 13 fouls and nine tackles. Jarbrinst Athletic also recorded more dribbles, 15 to 10, and edged pass accuracy, 83% to 82%. None of those margins alone suggests a four-goal haul. The clearest distinction was the visitors’ finishing: six shots, six on target and four goals, against five shots on target and one goal for Seadney County. Jarbrinst Athletic left with a 4-1 win, and the conversion rate did the explaining the wider statistics could not.