Leigham County 0 - 11 Poyall City

Key Events:

• 9' Poyall City Paul Kramer scores, assisted by Samuel Da Cruz
• 15' Poyall City Samuel Da Cruz scores, assisted by Paul Kramer
• 22' Poyall City Ramiro Castillo scores, assisted by Edgardo Machin
• 36' Yellow card to Poyall City Paul Kramer
• 38' Poyall City Paul Kramer scores, assisted by Moro Tanaka
• 39' Yellow card to Poyall City Ramiro Castillo
• 45' Poyall City Raymond van Dijk scores, assisted by Valdir Silva
• 50' Poyall City Erick Solis scores, assisted by Edgardo Machin
• 57' Poyall City Raymond van Dijk scores, assisted by Samuel Da Cruz
• 70' Poyall City Samuel Da Cruz scores, assisted by Mohamed Sobhy
• 74' Poyall City Raymond van Dijk scores
• 77' Yellow card to Poyall City Mohamed Sobhy
• 82' Yellow card to Leigham County Friedrich Unger
• 86' Poyall City Paul Kramer scores, assisted by Valdir Silva
• 88' Yellow card to Poyall City Samuel Da Cruz
• 90' Poyall City Moro Tanaka scores, assisted by Raymond van Dijk

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: The Gazzetta chance-quality estimate gave Leigham County 0.11 xG and Poyall City 4.76. Against those estimates, the hosts’ 0 goals were close to expectation, while Poyall City’s 11 represented substantial over-performance: six goals more than the model’s estimate. That does not make the visitors’ attacking display a statistical mirage. They put 18 of 20 shots on target, while Leigham County managed none of its single attempt. Still, the gap between 4.76 xG and 11 actual goals says Poyall City finished with remarkable efficiency, converting chances at a rate the estimate would not normally predict. Leigham County had more possession and better pass accuracy, but those advantages did not translate into shots or meaningful threat; possession, on this evidence, was not a substitute for a way out.

The 0-11 result was not a close contest dressed up by a late flurry: Poyall City had already scored four before the interval and continued adding goals after the break. Leigham County finished with more possession, corners and accurate passing, but only one shot and no shots on target. Poyall City’s 20 attempts, 18 on target and eleven goals tell the more useful story of the match. The visitors’ finishing ran well ahead of their xG, yet the sheer volume of accurate efforts made the scoreline a measure of sustained pressure as well as extraordinary conversion. For Leigham County, the possession figures offer a neat numerical detail, though not much consolation beside an eleven-goal deficit.