Weshams United 0 - 5 Hortlen

Key Events:

• 9' Yellow card to Hortlen Maya Ada
• 12' Yellow card to Weshams United Philippe Robert
• 39' Hortlen Mahi Benie scores, assisted by Maya Ada
• 42' Hortlen Mahi Benie scores, assisted by Jake Castillo
• 70' Hortlen Maya Ada scores
• 71' Hortlen Maya Ada scores
• 73' Hortlen Peter van den Broek scores, assisted by Jake Castillo

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: Hortlen recorded 3.89 xG and scored five, an overperformance of 1.11 goals; Weshams United produced 0.26 xG and finished without scoring. The difference in chance volume was stark: Hortlen had 16 shots, 15 on target, while Weshams United managed one shot, also on target. The numbers point to a match in which Hortlen consistently turned possession into attempts that tested the goal, while Weshams United’s 55% share of the ball did not translate into meaningful attacking output. Six corners for the hosts offered another route forward, but the single shot tells the plainer story. Hortlen needed no territorial majority to control the scoreboard; accuracy and volume did the work.

• Weshams United: No standout performers rated 7.0 or higher.
• Maya Ada (7.8) - Scored twice and assisted Mahi Benie’s opener, contributing directly to three goals despite receiving a yellow card.
• Mahi Benie (7.6) - Scored twice before half-time, giving Hortlen a firm grip on the match.
• Jake Castillo (7.0) - Supplied assists for two of Hortlen’s goals, including the finish that completed the scoring.

The first two goals came in a three-minute spell late in the first half, with Mahi Benie finishing chances set up by Maya Ada and Jake Castillo. That gave Hortlen a two-goal cushion, but it did not turn the second half into a holding exercise: three more goals arrived between the 70th and 73rd minutes. Maya Ada scored twice in consecutive minutes, then Peter van den Broek added the fifth, assisted by Jake Castillo. For Weshams United, the possession and passing figures offered a measure of control in the middle of the pitch, but not the attacking return required to make the contest close. The final score was 0-5, and the shot count explains why the arithmetic stayed so one-sided.