Cham-on Stanley 0 - 6 Bursidge

Key Events:

• 3' Bursidge Lyuben Kolev scores, assisted by Jose Gomez
• 16' Yellow card to Bursidge Donald Cairns
• 24' Bursidge Owen Nelson scores, assisted by Antonino Ruggeri
• 30' Yellow card to Bursidge Jose Gomez
• 37' Bursidge Takashi Inoue scores, assisted by Jose Gomez
• 45' Bursidge Yahaya Okon scores, assisted by Antonino Ruggeri
• 73' Bursidge Antonino Ruggeri scores, assisted by Takashi Inoue
• 75' Yellow card to Bursidge Yahaya Okon
• 79' Yellow card to Bursidge Heinz Baumann
• 90' Bursidge Jose Gomez scores, assisted by Antonino Ruggeri

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: Bursidge scored six from an xG of 3.79, finishing well above the chance-quality estimate. That is substantial over-performance, though it came with an attacking volume to match: 18 shots, 13 on target, and enough chances to make the result feel less like a statistical accident than an emphatic day in front of goal. Cham-on Stanley managed four shots, three on target, and 0.86 xG without scoring, falling short of even the modest return their chances suggested. The hosts held 55% possession and completed passes more accurately, but Bursidge turned its fewer share of the ball into far more attempts and a decisive lead by half-time. The figures point to a clear difference in threat, rather than a contest decided by who kept the ball longest.

No standout performers rated 7.0 or higher were recorded for Cham-on Stanley.

The 0-6 result was settled by Bursidge’s efficiency and attacking weight, not by a monopoly on the ball. Cham-on Stanley had more possession, completed a higher share of passes and attempted twice as many dribbles, but those advantages did not become enough sustained threat to alter the score. Bursidge were more direct in the decisive sense: they put 13 of 18 shots on target and spread the goals across the match, including two after the interval. Four yellow cards added a less polished strand to the visitors’ afternoon, but did not interrupt their scoring. For Cham-on Stanley, three shots on target and 0.86 xG offered something to build on; the blank beside their name on the scoreboard was the less forgiving part.