Ilfravis City 4 - 0 Maby Sand Villa

Key Events:

• 7' Ilfravis City Bruno Rossi scores, assisted by Jose Mendez
• 16' Ilfravis City Myungjun Seo scores
• 24' Yellow card to Maby Sand Villa Philippe Robert
• 34' Ilfravis City Myungjun Seo scores, assisted by Xinping Boon
• 45' Ilfravis City Xinping Boon scores, assisted by Paul Evans
• 53' Yellow card to Maby Sand Villa Jorge Alvez
• 87' Yellow card to Ilfravis City Saliou Sow

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: The Gazzetta chance-quality estimate put Ilfravis City at 5.13 xG and Maby Sand Villa at 1.91. The hosts scored four, finishing 1.13 below their estimate, while the visitors’ blank left them 1.91 short of theirs. That is a substantial gap between the quality of chances recorded and the final score for both sides, though the difference in shot volume was plain: 21 attempts to 10. With 20 efforts on target, Ilfravis City repeatedly made the goalkeeper work and built a lead that their attacking output justified; Maby Sand Villa reached promising enough positions to generate nearly two expected goals, but could not convert any of them. Possession was split 50-50, so this was less a matter of one side monopolising the ball than of Ilfravis City doing far more with its attacks.

• Maby Sand Villa: No standout performers rated 7.0 or higher.

The four-goal margin was established before the interval: Bruno Rossi opened the scoring in the seventh minute, Myungjun Seo added two more, and Xinping Boon completed the first-half haul on 45 minutes. The early sequence left Maby Sand Villa needing a response, but the visitors’ five corners and six shots on target produced no goal. Their possession share was level with Ilfravis City’s; the more decisive difference was what happened after each side moved forward.

The later cards to Jorge Alvez and Saliou Sow added a little bookkeeping to a match whose central story was already settled. Ilfravis City finished with four goals, 21 shots and a clear advantage in attacking volume, while Maby Sand Villa left with a respectable xG figure and no return on it. The scoreline was emphatic, even if the hosts’ own 5.13 xG suggests there was room to make it still larger.