The report
Key Events:
- 5' Leatertoch scores
- 17' Red card to Maltwolsh Michel Lemoine
- 21' Leatertoch scores
- 28' Leatertoch scores
- 36' Maltwolsh Thiago Gomes scores, assisted by Michael Brown
- 43' Leatertoch scores
- 45' Yellow card to Leatertoch an unnamed player
- 60' Leatertoch scores
Key Events:
- 5' Leatertoch scores
- 17' Red card to Michel Lemoine (Maltwolsh)
- 21' Leatertoch scores
- 28' Leatertoch scores
- 36' Thiago Gomes (Maltwolsh) scores, assisted by Michael Brown
- 43' Leatertoch scores
- 45' Yellow card to Leatertoch
- 60' Leatertoch scores
Expected Goals (xG) Analysis — The match’s xG figures tell a story of efficiency versus opportunity. Leatertoch’s 3.4 xG was nearly five times Maltwolsh’s 0.79, illustrating how the visitors’ attacking chances were not only frequent but of high quality. Maltwolsh’s single goal came from a modest xG of less than 1, highlighting their fortunate moment amid a sea of missed opportunities. The disparity in shot volume and accuracy—13 on target for Leatertoch compared to Maltwolsh’s 3—further underscores the tactical imbalance. Leatertoch’s ability to convert their chances into goals was markedly superior, making their victory a reflection of clinical finishing rather than mere dominance of possession.
The game’s tactical narrative was largely written in the visitors’ favor, with Leatertoch controlling the tempo and creating numerous high-quality opportunities. Maltwolsh’s red card at 17’ shifted the game further in Leatertoch’s direction, allowing them to press forward with numerical advantage. Despite the red card, Maltwolsh’s resilience was evident in their goal, which was well-crafted and helped briefly stem the tide. However, the overall pattern was clear: Leatertoch’s attacking potency and disciplined defending, complemented by their high pass accuracy (85%), proved too much for the hosts to handle on the day. The match’s statistics reflect this imbalance, with Leatertoch’s possession and shot metrics translating into a comprehensive victory.
No Maltwolsh players reached a rating of 7.0 or higher, reflecting their struggles to contain the visitors’ relentless attack and the impact of the early red card. Thiago Gomes (6.8) was the sole bright spot, scoring the hosts’ only goal and showing some resilience. For Leatertoch, despite the high scoreline, no player managed to breach the 7.0 threshold, but their collective effort was evident in the team’s high shot count and precision. The team’s disciplined approach and effective finishing made the difference, even if individual ratings did not soar.
Match Statistics:
Possession: Maltwolsh 43% - Leatertoch 57% Shots (On Target): Maltwolsh 3 (3) - Leatertoch 14 (13) Corners: Maltwolsh 0 - Leatertoch 0 Fouls: Maltwolsh 4 - Leatertoch 7 Yellow Cards: Maltwolsh 0 - Leatertoch 1 Red Cards: Maltwolsh 1 - Leatertoch 0 Dribbles: Maltwolsh 11 - Leatertoch 13 Pass Accuracy: Maltwolsh 78% - Leatertoch 85% Tackles: Maltwolsh 7 - Leatertoch 7
The final score of 1-5 encapsulates a game where Leatertoch’s attacking efficiency and tactical discipline outstripped Maltwolsh’s efforts, which were hampered by a red card and a lack of clinical finishing. The visitors’ dominance in shot quality and possession ultimately made the scoreline a fitting reflection of the match’s narrative.
The ratings desk
Standout performances
Shots (On Target): Maltwolsh 3
Leatertoch 14 (13)
Match Centre
Shot Breakdown
Roy Nadeau to Francisco Gomes. The event log names a helper; it does not name a body part.
Gazzetta reconstruction from match events — not pitch tracking.
Key Moments
Team Comparison

