Bichden County 2 - 4 Marnar

Key Events:

• 2' Yellow card to Bichden County Friedrich Unger
• 13' Yellow card to Marnar Xinping Boon
• 30' Marnar Kenny Au scores, assisted by Vladimir štimac
• 33' Bichden County Lindomar Da Silva scores, assisted by Luis Pinto
• 41' Marnar Michel Picard scores, assisted by Luis Pinto
• 54' Marnar Luis Pinto scores, assisted by Michel Picard
• 71' Marnar Vladimir štimac scores, assisted by Bruno Rossi
• 90' Bichden County Weijie Hong scores
• 90' Yellow card to Bichden County Lindomar Da Silva

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: Bichden County scored twice from 1.24 xG, a substantial return above the chances’ combined estimated quality. Marnar scored four from 4.13 xG, just below its expected total, so the visitors’ finishing was broadly in line with the opportunities they created. The shot count explains much of the difference: Marnar had 17 attempts, with 16 on target, while Bichden County managed six shots and four on target. Possession was relatively close at 47%-53%, but the volume of Marnar’s attempts suggests that territorial balance did not translate into equal control of the dangerous moments. Bichden County were efficient when they found a route to goal; Marnar found that route rather more often.

• Bichden County: No standout performers rated 7.0 or higher.
• Marnar:
• Vladimir štimac (7.3) - Scored once and assisted Kenny Au’s opener.
• Michel Picard (7.3) - Contributed a goal and an assist.
• Luis Pinto (7.3) - Scored and assisted, keeping his name involved at both ends of Marnar’s attack.

For a short spell after Lindomar Da Silva made it 1-1, the match offered Bichden County a foothold. Marnar restored the lead before half-time through Michel Picard, then Luis Pinto made it 3-1 in the 54th minute. The visitors’ fourth, Vladimir štimac’s 71st-minute goal, put the result beyond reasonable doubt; Weijie Hong’s late strike changed the final score, not the broad shape of the contest.

The numbers leave Bichden County with credit for turning a limited supply of chances into two goals, but little comfort in how often Marnar tested the target. The visitors’ 53% possession was only a modest edge; their 17 shots, seven corners and four goals tell a clearer story of sustained threat. Marnar earned the 4-2 win by creating far more, while Bichden County kept the closing scoreline from fully reflecting the gap in attacking volume.