Fill-on 1 - 4 Crowichurbrin

Key Events:

• 4' Yellow card to Crowichurbrin Philippe Robert
• 50' Crowichurbrin Philippe Robert scores, assisted by Jorge Alvez
• 57' Yellow card to Fill-on Jorge Alvez
• 61' Crowichurbrin Nilson Pires scores
• 62' Fill-on Pedro Chagas scores, assisted by Jorge Alvez
• 67' Crowichurbrin Nilson Pires scores, assisted by Seungwoo Jeong
• 69' Yellow card to Crowichurbrin Seungwoo Jeong
• 87' Crowichurbrin Michel Lemoine scores, assisted by Seungwoo Jeong

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: The Gazzetta chance-quality estimate gave Fill-on 1.53 xG and Crowichurbrin 2.35. Fill-on scored once, finishing below its estimate, while Crowichurbrin converted four times from a total that suggested a less emphatic return was more likely. The visitors’ 11 shots and eight on target gave their greater attacking volume a firm statistical footing; Fill-on put all six of its shots on target, but one goal from those efforts points to the gap between accuracy and conversion. The 53–47 possession split and 88% to 84% passing accuracy also leaned towards Crowichurbrin, without amounting to overwhelming control. The match’s decisive feature was how effectively the visitors turned their spells of pressure into goals, particularly after taking the lead: Fill-on replied quickly after the second, but Crowichurbrin scored again before the home side could make that response a turning point.

• Fill-on: No standout performers rated 7.0 or higher.
• Crowichurbrin: Nilson Pires (7.6) - Scored twice, supplying the visitors with a crucial goal before adding another to re-establish their two-goal advantage.

For Fill-on, the quick reply from Pedro Chagas offered a brief route back into the contest, and the hosts’ 16 dribbles showed they were willing to try to unsettle the visitors directly. But Crowichurbrin had an answer almost immediately: Nilson Pires scored five minutes later, and Seungwoo Jeong assisted both that goal and Michel Lemoine’s late finish. Across a match with equal fouls and no red cards, the difference was less about disorder than about the visitors making their attacking moments count. Crowichurbrin won 4-1, a margin larger than the xG gap, but supported by the shot count and a second half in which their finishing kept finding an unusually productive address.