Teessidgntrave 1 - 5 Marley County

Key Events:

• 8' Yellow card to Marley County Fred Bos
• 28' Yellow card to Marley County Miguel Dominguez
• 39' Yellow card to Marley County Senad Marković
• 42' Teessidgntrave Lindomar Da Silva scores, assisted by Luis Pinto
• 44' Marley County Robert Bouvier scores, assisted by Mark Tanaka
• 51' Yellow card to Teessidgntrave Luis Pinto
• 60' Marley County Robert Bouvier scores, assisted by Senad Marković
• 76' Marley County Fred Bos scores
• 79' Marley County Dylan Price scores, assisted by Martin Guerrero
• 88' Yellow card to Teessidgntrave Lindomar Da Silva
• 88' Marley County Robert Bouvier scores, assisted by Senad Marković

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis:

Teessidgntrave scored once from 0.98 xG, almost exactly matching the chance quality it created. Marley County scored five from 2.85 xG, finishing 2.15 goals above the estimate: a substantial overperformance, powered in particular by Bouvier’s three goals. That gap suggests ruthless conversion rather than a match in which five goals were simply the inevitable return from the chances on offer. Still, Marley County’s 13 shots and 10 on target, against Teessidgntrave’s five shots and three on target, show that the visitors created a much heavier stream of attempts. Teessidgntrave’s 57% possession and 10 corners offered territorial signs of promise, but control of the ball did not translate into a comparable volume of danger. Marley County were more direct in the useful sense: they put the ball toward goal often, found the net repeatedly, and made the hosts’ extra possession feel like a rather elaborate way to watch.

Teessidgntrave recorded no standout performers rated 7.0 or higher.

Marley County

• Robert Bouvier (8.4) - Scored a hat-trick, including the equaliser that quickly checked Teessidgntrave’s lead and a late third goal to complete his afternoon’s work.

The scoreline became emphatic, though the match did not begin that way. Teessidgntrave took the lead in the 42nd minute, only for Bouvier to level two minutes later, turning a brief home advantage into a short-lived detail. His second goal on the hour put Marley County ahead, and the late run of goals from Bos, Price and Bouvier stretched the margin to four. Teessidgntrave’s two yellow cards and Marley County’s three tell of a match with some edge, but neither side received a red card; the decisive separation came in the finishing.

Marley County leave with a 5-1 win built on greater attacking volume and striking efficiency beyond the xG estimate. Teessidgntrave’s possession, passing accuracy and corner count show that the hosts were not simply absent from the contest, but those measures could not compensate for the difference in shots on target. Bouvier was the standout, while the broader lesson is less mysterious: Marley County made far more of their opportunities, and Teessidgntrave could not keep pace once the visitors moved in front.