Seadebde United 4 - 0 Seadney County

Key Events:

• 20' Seadebde United Kees de Vries scores
• 36' Seadebde United Gerard Hoareau scores
• 70' Yellow card to Seadebde United Kees de Vries
• 73' Seadebde United Ahmed Samir scores, assisted by Gerard Hoareau
• 75' Yellow card to Seadebde United Arne Jensen
• 80' Seadebde United Kees de Vries scores
• 86' Yellow card to Seadney County Bruno Rossi

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: Seadebde United scored four from an xG of 3.93, a slim overperformance of 0.07 that amounts to an unusually tidy agreement between chance quality and outcome. Seadney County produced 1.06 xG but scored none, so the gap was not a lack of any opportunity at all; it was the inability to turn those chances into a goal. The shot count gives the broader shape: 18 attempts for the hosts, 14 on target, against six and three for the visitors. Possession was close at 51-49, but Seadebde United made far more of its share, while Seadney County had to settle for a busy dribble count without a return on the scoreboard.

Seadebde United Kees de Vries (7.3) - Scored twice and added a yellow card to a productive afternoon. Gerard Hoareau (7.3) - Scored once and assisted Ahmed Samir for the third goal.

Seadney County No standout performers rated 7.0 or higher.

The 4-0 result was emphatic without requiring a possession monopoly: Seadebde United had only a two-point edge in the ball, but a 12-shot advantage and 11 more shots on target. Seadney County completed passes at a slightly higher rate and attempted more dribbles, yet neither measure could close the gap created by the hosts’ much greater volume of attempts. The visitors’ 1.06 xG suggests the match was not entirely without promise for them, but promise is a notoriously poor substitute for a goal.

For Seadebde United, the pattern was clear and increasingly decisive: Kees de Vries opened the scoring, Gerard Hoareau added the second, and the pair combined again in the action that brought Ahmed Samir the third. Kees de Vries then scored again to make it four, with the hosts’ finishing landing almost exactly on its expected level. The clean sheet and four-goal margin leave Seadney County with the harder arithmetic: a respectable share of possession, some threatening activity, and nothing to show for it.