Crouthe-Seaton 11 - 0 Haret Park

Key Events:

• 5' Crouthe-Seaton Kees Bos scores, assisted by David Ross
• 18' Crouthe-Seaton Christopher Paredes scores, assisted by Jose Riascos
• 25' Yellow card to Crouthe-Seaton Antonio Vazquez
• 31' Crouthe-Seaton Kees Bos scores, assisted by Givi Dzanashvili
• 35' Crouthe-Seaton Givi Dzanashvili scores, assisted by Kees Bos
• 42' Crouthe-Seaton Givi Dzanashvili scores, assisted by David Ross
• 56' Crouthe-Seaton Givi Dzanashvili scores
• 62' Crouthe-Seaton Givi Dzanashvili scores, assisted by Kees Bos
• 67' Crouthe-Seaton Jose Riascos scores
• 70' Crouthe-Seaton Givi Dzanashvili scores
• 74' Yellow card to Haret Park Elhadji Diop
• 85' Crouthe-Seaton Kees Bos scores
• 90' Crouthe-Seaton Jose Riascos scores, assisted by David Ross

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: Crouthe-Seaton scored 11 from 4.32 xG, an extraordinary overperformance of 6.68 goals against the chance-quality estimate. Fifteen of their 20 shots were on target, so the finishing was not merely a statistical prank: they repeatedly made the goalkeeper work and converted at a remarkable rate. Haret Park recorded 0.01 xG and no shots, leaving no attacking return to set against the hosts’ tally. Possession was relatively close at 54%-46%, but the shot count tells the more useful story: Crouthe-Seaton turned its share of the ball into repeated danger, while Haret Park’s eight corners produced no recorded attempt.

• No Haret Park players reached a rating of 7.0.

The 11-0 scoreline was settled by neither a single burst nor a late collapse: Crouthe-Seaton scored five times before half-time, then added six more after the break. The spread of contributors mattered as much as the headline haul from Dzanashvili: Bos, Riascos and Ross all helped turn chances into goals, and the hosts kept finding routes to the net deep into the match. For Haret Park, the eight corners and 46% possession offered little consolation beside a zero in the shots column. The final 11-0 stands as a decisive result, with the xG gap explaining the scale of the performance and the finishing explaining why the scoreboard went further still.