Ilker County 11 - 0 Ingwadinst

Key Events:

• 3' Ilker County Rodrigo Vieira scores, assisted by Lucas Gomez
• 7' Yellow card to Ilker County Rodrigo Vieira
• 10' Yellow card to Ilker County Borislav Mehmed
• 17' Yellow card to Ilker County Lucas Gomez
• 20' Ilker County Sungha Bang scores, assisted by Lucas Gomez
• 28' Ilker County Borislav Mehmed scores
• 31' Ilker County Pedro Ana scores, assisted by Sungha Bang
• 32' Yellow card to Ilker County Massimiliano Gentile
• 41' Ilker County Sungha Bang scores, assisted by Rodrigo Vieira
• 43' Ilker County Rodrigo Vieira scores, assisted by Demba Ndiaye
• 48' Ilker County Borislav Mehmed scores, assisted by Lucas Gomez
• 58' Ilker County Borislav Mehmed scores
• 63' Ilker County Pedro Ana scores, assisted by Rodrigo Vieira
• 79' Ilker County Robert Watt scores, assisted by Demba Ndiaye
• 82' Yellow card to Ingwadinst Seungwoo Jeong
• 88' Ilker County Borislav Mehmed scores

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: Ilker County scored 11 from 4.02 xG, an extraordinary return well beyond what the chance-quality estimate would normally suggest. Their 15 shots on target from 17 attempts point to a finishing performance of unusual precision, though the margin between expected and actual goals is large enough to make the afternoon look less like routine conversion and more like every promising opening finding its way home. Ingwadinst, meanwhile, recorded 0.51 xG from just two shots, both on target, but finished without a goal. The hosts did not need to dominate the ball: with 44% possession, they turned their opportunities into a relentless stream of goals, while Ingwadinst’s 56% possession and five corners produced little threat by comparison.

• Ingwadinst: No standout performers (rating 7.0+) recorded.

The first goal arrived after three minutes, and Ilker County had three on the board by the 28th. By half-time, the score was already 6-0; the second half added five more, including a late finish from Borislav Mehmed in the 88th minute. Ingwadinst’s greater share of possession did not become control of the match’s decisive moments. Ilker County were direct when it counted, and the shot figures show how rarely they let a promising attack drift into mere possession.

Four first-half yellow cards for the hosts offered a small reminder that the afternoon was not entirely frictionless, even as the goals kept arriving. But the central story is a vast gap between the final score and the xG estimate: Ilker County’s ruthless finishing magnified an advantage that was already clear in the chances, while Ingwadinst could not turn its limited openings into a reply. An 11-0 result leaves little room for ambiguity; the numbers simply add that the visitors had more of the ball while the hosts had almost everything else.