Redind San Stanley 10 - 0 St Harmor

Key Events:

• 6' Yellow card to Redind San Stanley Eduard Haas
• 10' Redind San Stanley Pablo Diaz scores, assisted by Eduard Haas
• 12' Redind San Stanley Eduard Haas scores, assisted by Emmanuel Salisu
• 15' Yellow card to St Harmor Alvaro Velasco
• 17' Redind San Stanley Pablo Diaz scores
• 29' Redind San Stanley Emmanuel Salisu scores
• 30' Yellow card to St Harmor Zdravko Ivanišević
• 32' Redind San Stanley Emmanuel Salisu scores
• 35' Redind San Stanley Tim Hill scores, assisted by Pablo Diaz
• 38' Redind San Stanley Renato Guerreiro scores, assisted by Emmanuel Salisu
• 45' Redind San Stanley Pablo Diaz scores, assisted by Eduard Haas
• 52' Redind San Stanley Renato Guerreiro scores, assisted by Eduard Haas
• 54' Redind San Stanley Renato Guerreiro scores
• 59' Yellow card to St Harmor Simon Krog
• 80' Yellow card to Redind San Stanley Vasil Petrov

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: Redind San Stanley scored 10 from 4.46 xG, an extraordinary return roughly five and a half goals above the chance-quality estimate. The visitors’ 0.01 xG and zero shots underline how little attacking threat they generated, despite recording four corners and 16 dribbles. The hosts’ 20 shots, 16 on target and 54% possession point to sustained attacking pressure, while the gap between expected and actual goals says that pressure was finished with exceptional efficiency. St Harmor matched the hosts’ 81% pass accuracy, but that shared figure could not make up for the lack of attempts.

• St Harmor had no players rated 7.0 or higher.

The scoreline was already 7-0 by half-time, with Redind San Stanley scoring seven times before the interval and adding three more after it. The second-half goals from Renato Guerreiro made the margin still larger, while St Harmor finished without a shot despite finding opportunities to dribble and win corners. There was no late change in the match’s direction, only the final confirmation of it.

At 10-0, Redind San Stanley recorded a commanding win, and the numbers give the result two complementary explanations: the hosts created the match’s attacking volume and converted at a remarkable rate. St Harmor kept possession and passing accuracy within reach, but neither measure produced a single attempt. The 4.46 xG is a more ordinary account of the chances; the ten goals are the rather less ordinary account of what happened to them.