Mable 0 - 9 Stanstrad City

Key Events:

• 20' Stanstrad City Hugo Tavares scores, assisted by Takao Tanaka
• 29' Stanstrad City Takao Tanaka scores, assisted by Honoka Kitazawa
• 35' Yellow card to Stanstrad City Ljubo Ivanković
• 41' Stanstrad City Roy Lee scores, assisted by Stuart Johnson
• 42' Yellow card to Mable Philippe Robert
• 50' Stanstrad City Hugo Tavares scores, assisted by Jacques Carlier
• 52' Stanstrad City Jacques Carlier scores, assisted by Takao Tanaka
• 60' Stanstrad City Johannes de Vos scores, assisted by Takao Tanaka
• 68' Stanstrad City Johannes de Vos scores, assisted by Hugo Tavares
• 71' Stanstrad City Honoka Kitazawa scores, assisted by Takao Tanaka
• 79' Yellow card to Mable Michel Lemoine
• 90' Stanstrad City Takao Tanaka scores, assisted by Ljubo Ivanković

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: Stanstrad City scored nine from a Gazzetta chance-quality estimate of 3.37 xG, a substantial overperformance: the finishing was far more ruthless than the chances’ estimated quality alone would predict. Mable, meanwhile, recorded 0.51 xG and no goals, a modest shortfall beside the scale of the final score. The visitors’ 15 shots, including 12 on target, show a sustained supply of attempts; converting nine made that pressure exceptionally productive. Mable had only two shots, both on target, and the six-corner advantage did not translate into a goal. The corner count offers a small counterpoint to the broader numbers, but not a change to the central picture: Stanstrad City created far more shooting volume and finished with extraordinary efficiency.

• No Mable players reached a recorded rating of 7.0 or higher.

The final 0-9 score is emphatic, and the sequence after the interval made it more so: Stanstrad City scored six times in the second half, including twice in the space of two minutes. Mable did have nearly half the possession, six corners and the same number of tackles and dribbles as the visitors, but those measures could not compensate for the gulf in shots and goals. The match statistics do not describe every detail of how the chances arrived; they do make the outcome plain. Stanstrad City were more productive in front of goal than their xG suggested was likely, while Mable left with no score to show for their limited attempts.