Utt City 0 - 6 Suth Tidge City

Key Events:

• 25' Yellow card to Utt City Michel Lemoine
• 31' Yellow card to Utt City Jorge Alvez
• 41' Suth Tidge City Mark Idris scores, assisted by Mamadou Coulibaly
• 45' Suth Tidge City scores, assisted by Mamadou Coulibaly
• 47' Suth Tidge City Mamadou Coulibaly scores, assisted by Domingos Pina
• 51' Suth Tidge City scores, assisted by Domingos Pina
• 54' Yellow card to Suth Tidge City Bernard Yeo
• 60' Suth Tidge City Mark Idris scores, assisted by Bernard Yeo
• 86' Suth Tidge City Domingos Pina scores

Expected Goals (xG) Analysis: Suth Tidge City scored six from an xG of 4.14, outperforming the estimate by 1.86 goals. That is a substantial return, though the visitors’ 20 shots and 14 on target show this was not a handful of chances somehow promoted into a rout. Utt City recorded 0.46 xG and no goals, a smaller shortfall, but managed only three shots and one on target. Possession was nearly even at 49–51 per cent; the difference was what each side did with the ball. The visitors’ repeated pressure, eight corners and much higher shot volume gave their attack room to turn the match into a procession after the interval.

Utt City had no standout performers rated 7.0 or higher.

Suth Tidge City

• Mamadou Coulibaly (7.8) - Scored once and supplied two assists, helping set the tempo of the visitors’ decisive spell.

• Domingos Pina (7.8) - Added a goal and two assists, giving the attack another reliable source of invention.

• Mark Idris (7.6) - His two goals helped put the finishing touches on a commanding team performance.

• Pass Accuracy%: 80%-78%

• Tackles: 11-8

The match’s turning point came late in the first half, when Mark Idris opened the scoring at 41 minutes and an unnamed Suth Tidge City scorer added another at 45'. The next two goals arrived at 47' and 51', leaving Utt City with a steep task before the second half had properly settled. Idris struck again on 60', and Domingos Pina completed the six-goal return at 86'. Utt City did have slightly more dribbles and better pass accuracy, but neither measure could compensate for the gulf in attempts and shots on target. A fair amount of the ball, in other words, is not the same thing as a fair amount of the match.