Season Review · September 8, 2026
Thamington County: Solid performance - Reliable football with room for growth
Thamington County’s Season 22 was a commendable campaign marked by consistency and resilience. Finishing in 6th place in their division, the team demonstrated solid defensive organization and an effective attack, culminating in a goal difference of +26 across 22 league matches — a fun fact that highlights their offensive efficiency and defensive solidity. The season was characterized by a series of hard-fought matches, with the team securing 13 wins and suffering 9 losses, but notably avoiding any draws, which underscores their decisive approach on the pitch.
Finished
6th
Points
39
Record
13-0-9
GD
+26
Gary "Nano" Pettit-Thompson IV
Lead Football Journalist
The Match & Season Desk
Data-first, narrative-second. If it happened on the pitch, Gary filed it.
A Columns Desk filing — visual season centre first, then the full notebook.
Season Centre
The campaign in pictures — before the filing.
Position
6th
Points
39
Win Rate
59%
Games
22
Season Shape
Most used XI
Best-fit starting eleven for the campaign's most common formation.
Primary shape
4-3-3
Formation usage
Standouts
Season honours
MVP by goal contributions, plus the leading scorer and creator.
Season MVP
Milan Čaušević
CF
10 contributions
Top scorer
Milan Čaušević
CF
7 goals
Top assists
Eric Martin
LCM
6 assists
Season profile
League-relative strengths
Percentile rank against clubs in the same league. Further out is stronger.
- Results
- 39
- P54
- Scoring
- 58
- P54
- Defence
- 32
- P54
- Clean sheets
- 8
- P54
- Goal difference
- +26
- P54
Campaign Record
13-0-9
Wins
13
59%
Draws
0
0%
Losses
9
41%
Attack · Defence
+26 GD
The Filing
Gary's notebook, desk by desk — with the forthcoming newsroom voices framed around the edges.
From Gary's Notebook
Season Overview:
Filed by
Gary Nano
Thamington County’s Season 22 was a commendable campaign marked by consistency and resilience. Finishing in 6th place in their division, the team demonstrated solid defensive organization and an effective attack, culminating in a goal difference of +26 across 22 league matches — a fun fact that highlights their offensive efficiency and defensive solidity. The season was characterized by a series of hard-fought matches, with the team securing 13 wins and suffering 9 losses, but notably avoiding any draws, which underscores their decisive approach on the pitch.
This season’s performance reflects a team that is reliable and competitive within their division, showing potential for further growth. While they didn’t quite push for promotion, their balanced record and positive goal difference suggest that Thamington County is on an upward trajectory, ready to challenge even higher in the next campaign.
Campaign Highlights
Key Achievements and Highlights:
Filed by
Gary Nano
- Achieved a +26 goal difference across the season
- Scored 58 goals, showcasing attacking intent
- Conceded only 32 goals, indicating defensive strength
- Secured 13 wins, demonstrating resilience and consistency
Pressure Points
Areas for Improvement:
Desk lens
Touchline
While Thamington County displayed a solid season, the absence of draws suggests that the team could benefit from greater consistency in securing points from tight matches. Additionally, aiming to reduce losses and increase the number of points gained from draws could elevate their league standing further.
The Long View
Final Assessment:
Desk lens
The Ledger
Thamington County’s Season 22 was marked by a reliable and balanced approach, with a notable goal difference of +26 reflecting their offensive and defensive capabilities. Their 6th place finish indicates a competitive edge within their division, yet there remains room for growth, particularly in converting close matches into draws and reducing losses. With continued development, they are well-positioned to challenge higher in the next season.