Season Review · September 8, 2026
Suth Poth Park: Division 8 review - The season in numbers
Season 22 proved to be a challenging campaign for Suth Poth Park in Division 8. Finishing in 10th place out of the league’s teams, the club struggled to find consistency throughout the season. With only 5 wins, 3 draws, and 14 losses, the team faced difficulties in maintaining a positive run of results. The season's fun fact highlights that it was truly a season of football with its own unique story, marked by ups and downs that tested the resilience of the squad.
Gary's mark
1/5
Season Review
Finished
10th
Points
18
Record
5-3-14
GD
-20
Gary "Nano" Pettit-Thompson IV
Lead Football Journalist
The Match & Season Desk
Data-first, narrative-second. If it happened on the pitch, Gary filed it.
A Columns Desk filing — visual season centre first, then the full notebook.
Season Centre
The campaign in pictures — before the filing.
Position
10th
Points
18
Win Rate
23%
Games
22
Season Shape
Most used XI
Best-fit starting eleven for the campaign's most common formation.
Primary shape
3-4-3-A
Formation usage
Standouts
Season honours
MVP by goal contributions, plus the leading scorer and creator.
Season MVP
Friedrich Unger
CF
16 contributions
Top scorer
Friedrich Unger
CF
10 goals
Top assists
Khadim Diakhate
RM
7 assists
Season profile
League-relative strengths
Percentile rank against clubs in the same league. Further out is stronger.
- Results
- 18
- P21
- Scoring
- 28
- P38
- Defence
- 48
- P29
- Clean sheets
- 2
- P13
- Goal difference
- -20
- P38
1/5
Season mark
Season Rating
Campaign Record
5-3-14
Wins
5
23%
Draws
3
14%
Losses
14
64%
Attack · Defence
-20 GD
The Filing
Gary's notebook, desk by desk — with the forthcoming newsroom voices framed around the edges.
From Gary's Notebook
Season Overview:
Filed by
Gary Nano
Season 22 proved to be a challenging campaign for Suth Poth Park in Division 8. Finishing in 10th place out of the league’s teams, the club struggled to find consistency throughout the season. With only 5 wins, 3 draws, and 14 losses, the team faced difficulties in maintaining a positive run of results. The season's fun fact highlights that it was truly a season of football with its own unique story, marked by ups and downs that tested the resilience of the squad.
Despite the hurdles, Suth Poth Park managed to score 28 goals, though they conceded 48, resulting in a goal difference of -20. This season was a testament to the challenges faced on the pitch, with the team working hard to compete in a competitive division.
Campaign Highlights
Key Achievements and Highlights:
Filed by
Gary Nano
- Scored 28 goals across the season
- Conceded 48 goals, reflecting defensive struggles
- Achieved 5 wins despite tough competition
- Secured 3 draws in a difficult campaign
- Finished 10th in Division 8
Pressure Points
Areas for Improvement:
Desk lens
Touchline
Suth Poth Park's season was marked by a need for greater consistency and defensive solidity. The team conceded significantly more goals than they scored, which impacted their overall standing. Improving defensive organization and converting more goal-scoring opportunities could help turn close results into wins and elevate the club’s league position.
The Long View
Final Assessment:
Desk lens
The Ledger
Season 22 was a tough journey for Suth Poth Park, characterized by a challenging league position and a negative goal difference. The team showed resilience but needs to address defensive vulnerabilities and improve goal conversion to climb higher in the standings. With focused efforts on these areas, future campaigns could see a more competitive and successful performance.