
Season Review · September 8, 2026
Kirkhapley: Struggling season - Battling against the odds
Season 22 proved to be a challenging chapter for Kirkhapley, as the club faced significant hurdles in their league campaign. Finishing in 8th place in Division 5, league 2, the team struggled to find consistency and secure positive results. The season was marked by defensive vulnerabilities, with a staggering goal difference of -48, highlighting ongoing defensive struggles throughout the campaign. Despite their efforts, Kirkhapley found it difficult to turn matches in their favor, ending with only 8 wins and 14 losses. An interesting fun fact from this season is their goal difference of -48, which underscores the defensive issues that plagued the team.
Gary's mark
3/5
Below Average
Finished
8th
Points
24
Record
8-0-14
GD
-48

Gary "Nano" Pettit-Thompson IV
Lead Football Journalist
The Match & Season Desk
Data-first, narrative-second. If it happened on the pitch, Gary filed it.
A Columns Desk filing — visual season centre first, then the full notebook.
Season Centre
The campaign in pictures — before the filing.
Position
8th
Points
24
Win Rate
36%
Games
22
Season Shape
Most used XI
Best-fit starting eleven for the campaign's most common formation.
Primary shape
4-3-3-A
Formation usage
Standouts
Season honours
MVP by goal contributions, plus the leading scorer and creator.
Season MVP
Joao Lopes
RF
9 contributions
Top scorer
Joao Lopes
RF
8 goals
Top assists
Michael Brown
RB
5 assists
Season profile
League-relative strengths
Percentile rank against clubs in the same league. Further out is stronger.
- Results
- 24
- P38
- Scoring
- 28
- P29
- Defence
- 76
- P29
- Clean sheets
- 5
- P33
- Goal difference
- -48
- P29
3/5
Season mark
Below Average
Campaign Record
8-0-14
Wins
8
36%
Draws
0
0%
Losses
14
64%
Attack · Defence
-48 GD
The Filing
Gary's notebook, desk by desk — with the forthcoming newsroom voices framed around the edges.
From Gary's Notebook
Season Overview
Filed by
Gary Nano
Season 22 proved to be a challenging chapter for Kirkhapley, as the club faced significant hurdles in their league campaign. Finishing in 8th place in Division 5, league 2, the team struggled to find consistency and secure positive results. The season was marked by defensive vulnerabilities, with a staggering goal difference of -48, highlighting ongoing defensive struggles throughout the campaign. Despite their efforts, Kirkhapley found it difficult to turn matches in their favor, ending with only 8 wins and 14 losses. An interesting fun fact from this season is their goal difference of -48, which underscores the defensive issues that plagued the team.
The season was a test of resilience, with the team battling against the odds to stay competitive. While the results were not as hoped, the experience gained could serve as a foundation for future improvement. The lack of draws indicates that many matches were decided decisively against them, emphasizing the need for better defensive organization and goal-scoring consistency moving forward.
Campaign Highlights
Key Achievements and Highlights
Filed by
Gary Nano
- Scored 28 goals across the season
- Faced 76 goals against, reflecting defensive struggles
- Showed resilience despite tough results
Pressure Points
Areas for Improvement
Desk lens
Touchline
Kirkhapley's season was hampered by defensive issues, as evidenced by the goal difference of -48. The team needs to focus on strengthening their backline and reducing the number of goals conceded. Additionally, converting more scoring opportunities and securing draws could help improve overall standings and consistency.
The Long View
Final Assessment
Desk lens
The Ledger
Kirkhapley's Season 22 was a difficult journey marked by defensive vulnerabilities and a tough league position. While the team showed resilience and managed to secure 8 wins, their overall performance was hindered by a high goals against tally and no draws to balance results. The key strengths lie in their fighting spirit and goal-scoring efforts, but significant improvements are needed in defensive organization and match management to turn their fortunes around in future campaigns.
