Season Review · September 8, 2026
St Har County: Division 8 review - The season in numbers
Season 22 proved to be a challenging campaign for St Har County in Division 8. Finishing in 11th place out of the league, the team struggled to find consistency and secure vital points throughout the season. The club managed only 4 wins, 4 draws, and suffered 14 losses, reflecting a difficult period on the pitch. An interesting fun fact from this season is the goal difference of -25, highlighting significant defensive struggles that hampered their overall performance. Despite some offensive efforts, the team found it hard to contain opponents, leading to a tough season overall.
Gary's mark
1/5
Season Review
Finished
11th
Points
16
Record
4-4-14
GD
-25
Gary "Nano" Pettit-Thompson IV
Lead Football Journalist
The Match & Season Desk
Data-first, narrative-second. If it happened on the pitch, Gary filed it.
A Columns Desk filing — visual season centre first, then the full notebook.
Season Centre
The campaign in pictures — before the filing.
Position
11th
Points
16
Win Rate
18%
Games
22
Season Shape
Most used XI
Best-fit starting eleven for the campaign's most common formation.
Primary shape
5-2-1-2
Formation usage
Standouts
Season honours
MVP by goal contributions, plus the leading scorer and creator.
Season MVP
Friedrich Unger
AM
11 contributions
Top scorer
Norbert Fischer
LCM
7 goals
Top assists
Friedrich Unger
AM
5 assists
Season profile
League-relative strengths
Percentile rank against clubs in the same league. Further out is stronger.
- Results
- 16
- P8
- Scoring
- 28
- P42
- Defence
- 53
- P38
- Clean sheets
- 2
- P8
- Goal difference
- -25
- P46
1/5
Season mark
Season Rating
Campaign Record
4-4-14
Wins
4
18%
Draws
4
18%
Losses
14
64%
Attack · Defence
-25 GD
The Filing
Gary's notebook, desk by desk — with the forthcoming newsroom voices framed around the edges.
From Gary's Notebook
Season Overview:
Filed by
Gary Nano
Season 22 proved to be a challenging campaign for St Har County in Division 8. Finishing in 11th place out of the league, the team struggled to find consistency and secure vital points throughout the season. The club managed only 4 wins, 4 draws, and suffered 14 losses, reflecting a difficult period on the pitch. An interesting fun fact from this season is the goal difference of -25, highlighting significant defensive struggles that hampered their overall performance. Despite some offensive efforts, the team found it hard to contain opponents, leading to a tough season overall.
This season's results underscore the need for strategic adjustments and defensive solidity if St Har County hopes to improve in future campaigns. The club's efforts, while commendable, fell short of expectations, emphasizing the importance of addressing defensive vulnerabilities and building a more resilient squad.
Campaign Highlights
Key Achievements and Highlights:
Filed by
Gary Nano
- Scored 28 goals across the season
- Conceded 53 goals, reflecting defensive challenges
- Achieved 4 wins and 4 draws in league play
- Finished 11th in Division 8, with a total of 16 points
Pressure Points
Areas for Improvement:
Desk lens
Touchline
The primary area for improvement lies in defensive organization and resilience, as evidenced by the -25 goal difference. Addressing defensive frailties and perhaps refining tactical approaches could help reduce goals conceded and improve overall results.
The Long View
Final Assessment:
Desk lens
The Ledger
Season 22 was a difficult chapter for St Har County, marked by defensive struggles and a modest points tally. While the team showed resilience in some matches, the overall performance was hindered by defensive lapses and inconsistent results. Strengths include the ability to score goals, but to move forward, a focus on defensive solidity and tactical refinement will be essential for future success.