Season Review · September 8, 2026
Skersham: Division 8 review - The season in numbers
Skersham's Season 22 in Division 8 was a challenging campaign marked by defensive struggles and inconsistent results. The team finished in 11th place, with a total of 4 wins, 4 draws, and 14 losses. The season's fun fact highlights a significant issue: a goal difference of -35, reflecting defensive vulnerabilities that hampered their overall performance. Despite some moments of resilience, the team found it difficult to maintain consistency throughout the season.
Gary's mark
5/5
Season Review
Finished
11th
Points
16
Record
4-4-14
GD
-35
Gary "Nano" Pettit-Thompson IV
Lead Football Journalist
The Match & Season Desk
Data-first, narrative-second. If it happened on the pitch, Gary filed it.
A Columns Desk filing — visual season centre first, then the full notebook.
Season Centre
The campaign in pictures — before the filing.
Position
11th
Points
16
Win Rate
18%
Games
22
Season Shape
Most used XI
Best-fit starting eleven for the campaign's most common formation.
Primary shape
4-4-2
Formation usage
Standouts
Season honours
MVP by goal contributions, plus the leading scorer and creator.
Season MVP
Philippe Robert
RCF
9 contributions
Top scorer
Philippe Robert
RCF
6 goals
Top assists
Seungwoo Jeong
LCM
5 assists
Season profile
League-relative strengths
Percentile rank against clubs in the same league. Further out is stronger.
- Results
- 16
- P13
- Scoring
- 24
- P21
- Defence
- 59
- P4
- Clean sheets
- 2
- P13
- Goal difference
- -35
- P4
5/5
Season mark
Season Rating
Campaign Record
4-4-14
Wins
4
18%
Draws
4
18%
Losses
14
64%
Attack · Defence
-35 GD
The Filing
Gary's notebook, desk by desk — with the forthcoming newsroom voices framed around the edges.
From Gary's Notebook
Season Overview:
Filed by
Gary Nano
Skersham's Season 22 in Division 8 was a challenging campaign marked by defensive struggles and inconsistent results. The team finished in 11th place, with a total of 4 wins, 4 draws, and 14 losses. The season's fun fact highlights a significant issue: a goal difference of -35, reflecting defensive vulnerabilities that hampered their overall performance. Despite some moments of resilience, the team found it difficult to maintain consistency throughout the season.
This season was a tough learning curve for Skersham, as they battled to improve their standings and tighten their defense. The team scored 24 goals but conceded 59, indicating a need for defensive reinforcement and better goal management to climb higher in the league table.
Campaign Highlights
Key Achievements and Highlights:
Filed by
Gary Nano
- Scored 24 goals across the season
- Achieved 4 draws, showing some resilience in tight matches
- Secured 4 wins despite overall struggles
- Faced significant defensive challenges with a goal difference of -35
Pressure Points
Areas for Improvement:
Desk lens
Touchline
Skersham's season was marred by defensive issues, as evidenced by the high number of goals conceded and the negative goal difference. Improving defensive organization and reducing goals against will be critical for future success. Additionally, increasing goal-scoring efficiency and securing more wins will be essential to climb the league table.
Season Rating:(Poor)
The Long View
Final Assessment:
Desk lens
The Ledger
Skersham's Season 22 was a difficult campaign characterized by defensive struggles and inconsistent results, culminating in an 11th place finish. The team showed some resilience but needs to address defensive vulnerabilities and improve overall consistency to move up the division. Strengths include their ability to secure some wins and maintain a few draws, but the season's overall performance highlights significant areas for improvement.