
Season Review · September 8, 2026
Shishder Park: Division 8 review - The season in numbers
Season 22 proved to be a challenging campaign for Shishder Park in Division 8. With an 18.2% win rate, the team struggled to find consistent form throughout the season. The club finished in 12th place, reflecting a difficult period marked by more defeats than victories. Despite these hurdles, the team managed to secure six draws, showing resilience in some tightly contested matches. Fun fact: this season's win rate of 18.2% underscores the hurdles faced, but it also highlights the potential for growth and improvement in future campaigns.
Finished
12th
Points
18
Record
4-6-12
GD
-13

Gary "Nano" Pettit-Thompson IV
Lead Football Journalist
The Match & Season Desk
Data-first, narrative-second. If it happened on the pitch, Gary filed it.
A Columns Desk filing — visual season centre first, then the full notebook.
Season Centre
The campaign in pictures — before the filing.
Position
12th
Points
18
Win Rate
18%
Games
22
Season Shape
Most used XI
Best-fit starting eleven for the campaign's most common formation.
Primary shape
5-2-3
Formation usage
Standouts
Season honours
MVP by goal contributions, plus the leading scorer and creator.
Season MVP
Nilson Pires
CF
11 contributions
Top scorer
Nilson Pires
CF
7 goals
Top assists
Pedro Chagas
RW
6 assists
Season profile
League-relative strengths
Percentile rank against clubs in the same league. Further out is stronger.
- Results
- 18
- P4
- Scoring
- 25
- P8
- Defence
- 38
- P71
- Clean sheets
- 2
- P33
- Goal difference
- -13
- P38
Campaign Record
4-6-12
Wins
4
18%
Draws
6
27%
Losses
12
55%
Attack · Defence
-13 GD
The Filing
Gary's notebook, desk by desk — with the forthcoming newsroom voices framed around the edges.
From Gary's Notebook
Season Overview:
Filed by
Gary Nano
Season 22 proved to be a challenging campaign for Shishder Park in Division 8. With an 18.2% win rate, the team struggled to find consistent form throughout the season. The club finished in 12th place, reflecting a difficult period marked by more defeats than victories. Despite these hurdles, the team managed to secure six draws, showing resilience in some tightly contested matches. Fun fact: this season's win rate of 18.2% underscores the hurdles faced, but it also highlights the potential for growth and improvement in future campaigns.
Offensively, Shishder Park scored 25 goals, while conceding 38, resulting in a goal difference of -13. This negative goal difference indicates defensive and offensive struggles that impacted their overall standing. The season was a test of perseverance, with the team aiming to build on lessons learned and push for better results next season.
Campaign Highlights
Key Achievements and Highlights:
Filed by
Gary Nano
- Scored 25 goals across the season
- Conceded 38 goals, highlighting defensive challenges
- Achieved 6 draws, showing resilience in tough matches
- Finished 12th in Division 8
- Maintained a fighting spirit despite a tough season
Pressure Points
Areas for Improvement:
Desk lens
Touchline
Shishder Park's season was marked by a high number of losses (12) and a negative goal difference. Improving defensive solidity and increasing goal-scoring efficiency would be essential steps forward. Addressing these areas could help convert more draws and narrow the gap in future seasons.
The Long View
Final Assessment:
Desk lens
The Ledger
Season 22 was a tough journey for Shishder Park, with a final position of 12th and a season rating of "Poor." The team faced significant challenges, particularly in defense and goal scoring, reflected in their goal difference and points tally. While resilience was evident in the number of draws, there is clear room for improvement in both defensive organization and attacking potency. With focused development, the club can aim for better results in the next campaign.
