Season Review · September 8, 2026
Kington Park: Division 8 review - The season in numbers
Kington Park's Season 22 in Division 8 was a challenging campaign marked by defensive struggles and a tough fight for consistency. The team managed to secure only 5 wins and 4 draws, but suffered 13 losses, reflecting the difficulties faced throughout the season. An interesting fun fact about this campaign is their goal difference of -24, highlighting the defensive issues that plagued their efforts on the pitch. Despite their efforts, the team found it hard to keep opponents at bay, which ultimately impacted their league standing.
Gary's mark
5/5
Season Review
Finished
10th
Points
19
Record
5-4-13
GD
-24
Gary "Nano" Pettit-Thompson IV
Lead Football Journalist
The Match & Season Desk
Data-first, narrative-second. If it happened on the pitch, Gary filed it.
A Columns Desk filing — visual season centre first, then the full notebook.
Season Centre
The campaign in pictures — before the filing.
Position
10th
Points
19
Win Rate
23%
Games
22
Season Shape
Most used XI
Best-fit starting eleven for the campaign's most common formation.
Primary shape
4-4-2
Formation usage
Standouts
Season honours
MVP by goal contributions, plus the leading scorer and creator.
Season MVP
Nilson Pires
LCF
8 contributions
Top scorer
Philippe Robert
RCF
5 goals
Top assists
Nilson Pires
LCF
5 assists
Season profile
League-relative strengths
Percentile rank against clubs in the same league. Further out is stronger.
- Results
- 19
- P21
- Scoring
- 25
- P17
- Defence
- 49
- P29
- Clean sheets
- 2
- P17
- Goal difference
- -24
- P21
5/5
Season mark
Season Rating
Campaign Record
5-4-13
Wins
5
23%
Draws
4
18%
Losses
13
59%
Attack · Defence
-24 GD
The Filing
Gary's notebook, desk by desk — with the forthcoming newsroom voices framed around the edges.
From Gary's Notebook
Season Overview:
Filed by
Gary Nano
Kington Park's Season 22 in Division 8 was a challenging campaign marked by defensive struggles and a tough fight for consistency. The team managed to secure only 5 wins and 4 draws, but suffered 13 losses, reflecting the difficulties faced throughout the season. An interesting fun fact about this campaign is their goal difference of -24, highlighting the defensive issues that plagued their efforts on the pitch. Despite their efforts, the team found it hard to keep opponents at bay, which ultimately impacted their league standing.
Throughout the season, Kington Park showed resilience but lacked the offensive firepower and defensive solidity needed to climb higher in the table. The season was a test of perseverance, with the team battling to improve their standings in a competitive division.
Campaign Highlights
Key Achievements and Highlights:
Filed by
Gary Nano
- Scored 25 goals across the season
- Conceded 49 goals, reflecting defensive challenges
- Finished 10th in Division 8
- Achieved 4 draws, showing some resilience in matches
- Ended the season with 19 points
Pressure Points
Areas for Improvement:
Desk lens
Touchline
Kington Park's season was hampered by defensive vulnerabilities, as evidenced by their goal difference of -24. Addressing defensive organization and consistency could significantly improve results. Additionally, increasing goal-scoring output would help convert more matches into wins, boosting their points tally and league position.
Season Rating:(Poor)
The Long View
Final Assessment:
Desk lens
The Ledger
Kington Park's Season 22 was a difficult campaign characterized by defensive struggles and a modest points total. While the team showed some resilience with draws and a handful of wins, their overall performance was hindered by conceding too many goals. Strengthening the defense and boosting offensive production will be key areas to focus on moving forward to climb higher in the division.