Season Review · September 8, 2026
Faven Park: Difficult campaign - A season to learn from and improve
Season 22 was a challenging chapter for Faven Park, as they navigated the complexities of Division 4 with limited success. The team managed only 3 wins and 2 draws, suffering 17 defeats along the way. Their goal-scoring efforts were modest, netting just 12 goals across the campaign, while their defensive record was notably poor, conceding 67 goals. This resulted in a goal difference of -55, highlighting significant defensive struggles throughout the season. Interestingly, despite the tough results, the club's fun fact reveals a goal difference of -55, underscoring the defensive challenges faced during this period.
Gary's mark
1/5
Season Review
Finished
9th
Points
11
Record
3-2-17
GD
-55
Gary "Nano" Pettit-Thompson IV
Lead Football Journalist
The Match & Season Desk
Data-first, narrative-second. If it happened on the pitch, Gary filed it.
A Columns Desk filing — visual season centre first, then the full notebook.
Season Centre
The campaign in pictures — before the filing.
Position
9th
Points
11
Win Rate
14%
Games
22
Season Shape
Most used XI
Best-fit starting eleven for the campaign's most common formation.
Primary shape
3-4-3-A
Formation usage
Standouts
Season honours
MVP by goal contributions, plus the leading scorer and creator.
Season MVP
Nilson Pires
CF
6 contributions
Top scorer
Nilson Pires
CF
6 goals
Top assists
Philippe Robert
RF
2 assists
Season profile
League-relative strengths
Percentile rank against clubs in the same league. Further out is stronger.
- Results
- 11
- P25
- Scoring
- 12
- P29
- Defence
- 67
- P33
- Clean sheets
- 3
- P33
- Goal difference
- -55
- P38
1/5
Season mark
Season Rating
Campaign Record
3-2-17
Wins
3
14%
Draws
2
9%
Losses
17
77%
Attack · Defence
-55 GD
The Filing
Gary's notebook, desk by desk — with the forthcoming newsroom voices framed around the edges.
From Gary's Notebook
Season Overview:
Filed by
Gary Nano
Season 22 was a challenging chapter for Faven Park, as they navigated the complexities of Division 4 with limited success. The team managed only 3 wins and 2 draws, suffering 17 defeats along the way. Their goal-scoring efforts were modest, netting just 12 goals across the campaign, while their defensive record was notably poor, conceding 67 goals. This resulted in a goal difference of -55, highlighting significant defensive struggles throughout the season. Interestingly, despite the tough results, the club's fun fact reveals a goal difference of -55, underscoring the defensive challenges faced during this period.
This season has been a tough learning experience for Faven Park, emphasizing areas that need urgent attention to climb the ranks in future campaigns. The club's resilience will be tested as they aim to rebuild and improve upon these foundations.
Campaign Highlights
Key Achievements and Highlights:
Filed by
Gary Nano
- None recorded for this difficult season.
- The team faced tough opposition, reflected in the high goals against tally.
Pressure Points
Areas for Improvement:
Desk lens
Touchline
Faven Park's season was marred by defensive vulnerabilities and limited goal-scoring. The high number of losses and the significant goal difference highlight the need for a more solid defensive structure and increased offensive productivity to turn close matches into wins.
The Long View
Final Assessment:
Desk lens
The Ledger
Season 22 was undoubtedly a difficult campaign for Faven Park, characterized by defensive struggles and limited success on the pitch. The club's main strengths lie in their resilience and willingness to learn from adversity. Moving forward, focusing on defensive organization and goal-scoring opportunities will be crucial for improvement. With targeted efforts, Faven Park has the potential to bounce back stronger in the next season.