Season Review · September 8, 2026
Farmskes: Difficult campaign - A season to learn from and improve
Season 22 proved to be a challenging chapter for Farmskes, as the team navigated a tough division with limited success on the pitch. The club finished in 10th place in league 26, managing only 2 wins, 4 draws, and suffering 16 losses. The season's fun fact highlights the defensive struggles faced throughout: a goal difference of -81, with only 4 goals scored and a staggering 85 conceded, underscores the defensive frailties that hampered their overall performance. This season served as a stark reminder of the areas needing significant improvement to climb the ranks in future campaigns.
Gary's mark
1/5
Season Review
Finished
10th
Points
10
Record
2-4-16
GD
-81
Gary "Nano" Pettit-Thompson IV
Lead Football Journalist
The Match & Season Desk
Data-first, narrative-second. If it happened on the pitch, Gary filed it.
A Columns Desk filing — visual season centre first, then the full notebook.
Season Centre
The campaign in pictures — before the filing.
Position
10th
Points
10
Win Rate
9%
Games
22
Season Shape
Most used XI
Best-fit starting eleven for the campaign's most common formation.
Primary shape
4-3-3
Formation usage
Standouts
Season honours
MVP by goal contributions, plus the leading scorer and creator.
Season MVP
Michel Lemoine
RCM
3 contributions
Top scorer
Michel Lemoine
RCM
1 goals
Top assists
Michel Lemoine
RCM
2 assists
Season profile
League-relative strengths
Percentile rank against clubs in the same league. Further out is stronger.
- Results
- 10
- P21
- Scoring
- 4
- P4
- Defence
- 85
- P21
- Clean sheets
- 5
- P21
- Goal difference
- -81
- P21
1/5
Season mark
Season Rating
Campaign Record
2-4-16
Wins
2
9%
Draws
4
18%
Losses
16
73%
Attack · Defence
-81 GD
The Filing
Gary's notebook, desk by desk — with the forthcoming newsroom voices framed around the edges.
From Gary's Notebook
Season Overview
Filed by
Gary Nano
Season 22 proved to be a challenging chapter for Farmskes, as the team navigated a tough division with limited success on the pitch. The club finished in 10th place in league 26, managing only 2 wins, 4 draws, and suffering 16 losses. The season's fun fact highlights the defensive struggles faced throughout: a goal difference of -81, with only 4 goals scored and a staggering 85 conceded, underscores the defensive frailties that hampered their overall performance. This season served as a stark reminder of the areas needing significant improvement to climb the ranks in future campaigns.
Despite the hardships, Farmskes gained valuable experience and insights from a difficult season. The club's resilience and lessons learned will be crucial stepping stones toward future development and success.
Campaign Highlights
Key Achievements and Highlights
Filed by
Gary Nano
- Few wins but valuable learning opportunities
- Multiple draws providing some stability
- Defensive struggles highlighted by a poor goal difference
Pressure Points
Areas for Improvement
Desk lens
Touchline
Farmskes' season was marred by defensive issues, as evidenced by the goals conceded and goal difference. Addressing defensive organization, increasing goal-scoring output, and reducing losses will be vital for turning around future campaigns.
The Long View
Final Assessment
Desk lens
The Ledger
Season 22 was undeniably a difficult campaign for Farmskes, marked by defensive struggles and limited success on the pitch. While the team faced significant challenges, this season provides a foundation for learning and growth. Focusing on defensive solidity and offensive productivity will be key to improving their league standing in the seasons ahead.