Season Review · September 8, 2026
Fard: Division 8 review - The season in numbers
Fard's Season 22 was a challenging campaign in Division 8, marked by defensive struggles and a tough fight for points. The team finished in 9th place, accumulating only 4 wins, 6 draws, and suffering 12 losses. The season's fun fact highlights a significant issue: a goal difference of -43, reflecting defensive vulnerabilities that hampered their overall performance. Despite some moments of resilience, the team found it difficult to keep opponents at bay, resulting in a season of hard lessons and ongoing development.
Gary's mark
5/5
Season Review
Finished
9th
Points
18
Record
4-6-12
GD
-43
Gary "Nano" Pettit-Thompson IV
Lead Football Journalist
The Match & Season Desk
Data-first, narrative-second. If it happened on the pitch, Gary filed it.
A Columns Desk filing — visual season centre first, then the full notebook.
Season Centre
The campaign in pictures — before the filing.
Position
9th
Points
18
Win Rate
18%
Games
22
Season Shape
Most used XI
Best-fit starting eleven for the campaign's most common formation.
Primary shape
3-4-3-A
Formation usage
Standouts
Season honours
MVP by goal contributions, plus the leading scorer and creator.
Season MVP
Pedro Chagas
RF
8 contributions
Top scorer
Pedro Chagas
RF
6 goals
Top assists
Michel Lemoine
AM
6 assists
Season profile
League-relative strengths
Percentile rank against clubs in the same league. Further out is stronger.
- Results
- 18
- P29
- Scoring
- 22
- P13
- Defence
- 65
- P21
- Clean sheets
- 3
- P46
- Goal difference
- -43
- P13
5/5
Season mark
Season Rating
Campaign Record
4-6-12
Wins
4
18%
Draws
6
27%
Losses
12
55%
Attack · Defence
-43 GD
The Filing
Gary's notebook, desk by desk — with the forthcoming newsroom voices framed around the edges.
From Gary's Notebook
Season Overview:
Filed by
Gary Nano
Fard's Season 22 was a challenging campaign in Division 8, marked by defensive struggles and a tough fight for points. The team finished in 9th place, accumulating only 4 wins, 6 draws, and suffering 12 losses. The season's fun fact highlights a significant issue: a goal difference of -43, reflecting defensive vulnerabilities that hampered their overall performance. Despite some moments of resilience, the team found it difficult to keep opponents at bay, resulting in a season of hard lessons and ongoing development.
This season was a clear reminder of the importance of defensive organization and consistency. While the team managed to score 22 goals, their inability to prevent goals conceded—65 in total—ultimately limited their success and left them near the lower end of the standings.
Campaign Highlights
Key Achievements and Highlights:
Filed by
Gary Nano
- Scored 22 goals across the season
- Secured 6 draws, showing some resilience in tough matches
- Demonstrated perseverance despite a difficult campaign
Pressure Points
Areas for Improvement:
Desk lens
Touchline
Fard needs to address their defensive vulnerabilities, as evidenced by their goal difference of -43. Improving defensive organization and reducing goals conceded will be crucial for climbing higher in the division standings. Additionally, converting more scoring opportunities could help turn draws into wins and improve overall points tally.
Season Rating:(Poor)
The Long View
Final Assessment:
Desk lens
The Ledger
Fard's Season 22 was marked by defensive struggles and a tough fight in Division 8. The team showed resilience but lacked consistency at both ends of the pitch. Strengths include their ability to secure draws and score goals, but the significant defensive issues and overall points tally highlight the need for strategic improvements. With focused efforts on defensive solidity, Fard can aim for better results in the next campaign.