Season Review · September 8, 2026
Fracompton: Division 8 review - The season in numbers
Season 22 proved to be a challenging campaign for Fracompton in Division 8. Finishing in 9th place with only 6 wins, 2 draws, and 14 losses, the team struggled to find consistency on the pitch. The season's fun fact highlights a significant defensive issue, as Fracompton conceded 58 goals, resulting in a goal difference of -37. This defensive fragility was a key factor in their overall performance and points tally, which stood at just 20 points by the season's end.
Gary's mark
1/5
Season Review
Finished
9th
Points
20
Record
6-2-14
GD
-37
Gary "Nano" Pettit-Thompson IV
Lead Football Journalist
The Match & Season Desk
Data-first, narrative-second. If it happened on the pitch, Gary filed it.
A Columns Desk filing — visual season centre first, then the full notebook.
Season Centre
The campaign in pictures — before the filing.
Position
9th
Points
20
Win Rate
27%
Games
22
Season Shape
Most used XI
Best-fit starting eleven for the campaign's most common formation.
Primary shape
3-5-2
Formation usage
Standouts
Season honours
MVP by goal contributions, plus the leading scorer and creator.
Season MVP
Philippe Robert
RCF
7 contributions
Top scorer
Nilson Pires
LCF
5 goals
Top assists
Pedro Chagas
LM
4 assists
Season profile
League-relative strengths
Percentile rank against clubs in the same league. Further out is stronger.
- Results
- 20
- P29
- Scoring
- 21
- P21
- Defence
- 58
- P38
- Clean sheets
- 4
- P38
- Goal difference
- -37
- P29
1/5
Season mark
Season Rating
Campaign Record
6-2-14
Wins
6
27%
Draws
2
9%
Losses
14
64%
Attack · Defence
-37 GD
The Filing
Gary's notebook, desk by desk — with the forthcoming newsroom voices framed around the edges.
From Gary's Notebook
Season Overview:
Filed by
Gary Nano
Season 22 proved to be a challenging campaign for Fracompton in Division 8. Finishing in 9th place with only 6 wins, 2 draws, and 14 losses, the team struggled to find consistency on the pitch. The season's fun fact highlights a significant defensive issue, as Fracompton conceded 58 goals, resulting in a goal difference of -37. This defensive fragility was a key factor in their overall performance and points tally, which stood at just 20 points by the season's end.
Despite the difficulties, the team showed resilience in some matches, but overall, the season was marked by defensive struggles and a lack of offensive firepower, with only 21 goals scored. The season's results reflect a tough journey through the division, with room for improvement across all areas.
Campaign Highlights
Key Achievements and Highlights:
Filed by
Gary Nano
- None noted; the season was predominantly characterized by defensive challenges and a lower league position.
Pressure Points
Areas for Improvement:
Desk lens
Touchline
Fracompton's season was marred by defensive struggles, as evidenced by the -37 goal difference and the high number of goals conceded. Improving defensive organization and reducing goals against will be critical in future campaigns. Additionally, increasing goal-scoring output and securing more wins will help climb the league table.
The Long View
Final Assessment:
Desk lens
The Ledger
Season 22 was a difficult chapter for Fracompton, marked by defensive vulnerabilities and a modest points total. The team’s main strengths lie in their resilience and effort, but significant improvements are needed in defensive solidity and goal-scoring to move up the division. With focused development, the club can aim for better results in the next season.