Season Review · September 8, 2026
Ashambead Gre: Division 8 review - The season in numbers
Ashambead Gre's Season 22 was a challenging campaign in Division 8, finishing in 9th place with 24 points. The team managed to secure 6 wins and 6 draws but suffered 10 losses, reflecting a season of inconsistency. An interesting fun fact from this season is their goal difference of -24, highlighting significant defensive struggles throughout the campaign. Despite some offensive efforts, the team found it difficult to contain opponents, which ultimately impacted their overall standing.
Gary's mark
1/5
Season Review
Finished
9th
Points
24
Record
6-6-10
GD
-24
Gary "Nano" Pettit-Thompson IV
Lead Football Journalist
The Match & Season Desk
Data-first, narrative-second. If it happened on the pitch, Gary filed it.
A Columns Desk filing — visual season centre first, then the full notebook.
Season Centre
The campaign in pictures — before the filing.
Position
9th
Points
24
Win Rate
27%
Games
22
Season Shape
Most used XI
Best-fit starting eleven for the campaign's most common formation.
Primary shape
4-3-3-H
Formation usage
Standouts
Season honours
MVP by goal contributions, plus the leading scorer and creator.
Season MVP
Philippe Robert
CF
12 contributions
Top scorer
Philippe Robert
CF
8 goals
Top assists
Pedro Chagas
RW
5 assists
Season profile
League-relative strengths
Percentile rank against clubs in the same league. Further out is stronger.
- Results
- 24
- P33
- Scoring
- 27
- P46
- Defence
- 51
- P21
- Clean sheets
- 3
- P42
- Goal difference
- -24
- P21
1/5
Season mark
Season Rating
Campaign Record
6-6-10
Wins
6
27%
Draws
6
27%
Losses
10
45%
Attack · Defence
-24 GD
The Filing
Gary's notebook, desk by desk — with the forthcoming newsroom voices framed around the edges.
From Gary's Notebook
Season Overview:
Filed by
Gary Nano
Ashambead Gre's Season 22 was a challenging campaign in Division 8, finishing in 9th place with 24 points. The team managed to secure 6 wins and 6 draws but suffered 10 losses, reflecting a season of inconsistency. An interesting fun fact from this season is their goal difference of -24, highlighting significant defensive struggles throughout the campaign. Despite some offensive efforts, the team found it difficult to contain opponents, which ultimately impacted their overall standing.
Throughout the season, Ashambead Gre faced tough competition and struggled to find stability at the back, as evidenced by their negative goal difference. The season was marked by moments of resilience but was ultimately marred by defensive lapses that cost them valuable points and prevented a higher league finish.
Campaign Highlights
Key Achievements and Highlights:
Filed by
Gary Nano
- Scored 27 goals across the season
- Conceded 51 goals, indicating defensive challenges
- Equal number of wins and draws (6 each)
- Finished 9th in Division 8
Pressure Points
Areas for Improvement:
Desk lens
Touchline
The primary area for improvement lies in defensive organization and consistency. The team’s -24 goal difference underscores the need to tighten up at the back and reduce conceding opportunities. Additionally, converting more attacking chances could help improve overall results and climb the league table.
The Long View
Final Assessment:
Desk lens
The Ledger
Ashambead Gre's Season 22 was marked by defensive struggles and an overall lack of consistency, finishing in 9th place with 24 points. While the team showed some offensive capability by netting 27 goals, their defensive frailty resulted in a significant negative goal difference. Strengths include the ability to secure draws and maintain some competitiveness, but the season was hindered by defensive lapses that need addressing for future success.