
Season Review · September 29, 2025
A Season of Struggles and Sobering Stats: Preweston’s 13th Campaign
Ah, Preweston fans, what a season to forget. Season 11 for WPFC will go down in the annals as one of the most challenging in the club’s recent history—an unrelenting grind marked by frustration, futility, and a stark absence of victories. With a final tally of 0 wins, 0 draws, and 22 losses in Division 6, this campaign was less a football season and more a test of endurance—and perhaps patience.
Finished
12th
Points
0
Record
0-0-22
GD
-92

Gary 'Nano' Pettit-Thompson IV
Lead Football Journalist
The Match & Season Desk
Data-first, narrative-second. If it happened on the pitch, Gary filed it.
A Columns Desk filing — visual season centre first, then the full notebook.
Season Centre
The campaign in pictures — before the filing.
Position
12th
Points
0
Win Rate
0%
Games
22
Season profile
League-relative strengths
Percentile rank against clubs in the same league. Further out is stronger.
- Results
- 0
- P4
- Scoring
- 12
- P4
- Defence
- 104
- P4
- Goal difference
- -92
- P4
Campaign Record
0-0-22
Wins
0
0%
Draws
0
0%
Losses
22
100%
Attack · Defence
-92 GD
The Filing
Gary's notebook, desk by desk — with the forthcoming newsroom voices framed around the edges.
From Gary's Notebook
Season Overview
Filed by
Gary Nano
Ah, Preweston fans, what a season to forget. Season 11 for WPFC will go down in the annals as one of the most challenging in the club’s recent history—an unrelenting grind marked by frustration, futility, and a stark absence of victories. With a final tally of 0 wins, 0 draws, and 22 losses in Division 6, this campaign was less a football season and more a test of endurance—and perhaps patience.
Overall, the numbers paint a bleak picture. Zero points from 22 games, a goal tally of just 12, and a staggering goal against of 104—these aren’t just bad; they’re catastrophic. The goal difference of -92 underscores the defensive and offensive struggles that plagued WPFC throughout the year. To put it into perspective, the team’s possession average of 314.9%—yes, you read that right—suggests a statistical anomaly or perhaps a typo, but if taken at face value, it hints at a team that dominated possession but lacked the creativity or execution to turn that into meaningful chances. Instead, they were often caught out, conceding goals at an alarming rate.
Campaign Highlights
Season Highlights
Filed by
Gary Nano
Highlight reel? Well, if there was one, it would be the 12 goals scored—an achievement in itself considering the team’s overall performance. Unfortunately, there were no wins or draws to celebrate, but every team has its moments, even in adversity. Perhaps the most notable aspect was the resilience in the face of relentless defeat; 22 games played, 22 losses, yet the team kept showing up. That kind of perseverance, while admirable, is ultimately hollow without results.
Another “highlight” might be the fact that despite the heavy losses, the team managed to keep their spirits (or perhaps their heads) high enough to continue competing. It’s a testament to the club’s resilience, even if the scoreboard tells a different story.
Standout Filings
Player Analysis
Filed by
Gary Nano
While individual standout performances are scarce in a season like this, it’s worth mentioning the top performers—though details are sparse, the fact that the team managed to net 12 goals suggests some players showed flashes of competence. Perhaps a striker or two found the net on occasion, providing a glimmer of hope amid the gloom. Defensive efforts, however, were clearly lacking, with the team conceding more than four goals per game on average, which indicates a systemic issue rather than isolated errors.
Without specific names, we can only infer that the squad lacked the cohesion and defensive solidity needed to compete at this level. The high possession percentage hints at a team that dominated the ball but failed to translate that into scoring chances or defensive stability—an indication of tactical misalignment or perhaps a squad lacking the quality to execute a cohesive game plan.
The Long View
Looking Ahead
Desk lens
The Ledger
Preweston’s future hinges on a fundamental overhaul. The 13th season was a harsh lesson in what not to do—defensively porous, offensively inept, and psychologically battered. The club must focus on rebuilding the squad, instilling discipline, and developing a tactical approach that balances possession with purpose. Youth development and recruitment will be key; otherwise, this cycle of futility will only continue.
There’s no sugarcoating it: the road ahead is steep, and the club needs a strategic reset. If they can learn from this season’s failures, there’s hope that WPFC can rise from the ashes and find a more competitive footing in the seasons to come.
From the Columns Desk
Fun Facts
Filed by
Gary Nano
- WPFC played 22 games but failed to secure a single point—an unprecedented feat in the league’s history.
- The team scored 12 goals but conceded 104, resulting in a goal difference of -92—the worst in the division by a wide margin.
- Despite their struggles, the team maintained an astonishing possession average of 314.9%, which, if accurate, suggests a team that dominated the ball but lacked the ability to capitalize or defend effectively.
- The team’s goal tally of 12 was 10 more than their total points, highlighting that even in defeat, they managed to find the net occasionally—a small mercy in a season of despair.
In sum, Season 11 for Preweston was a brutal reminder of the harsh realities of football at this level. It’s a season that will be remembered more for its futility than its feats, but with the right adjustments, perhaps the future holds brighter days.
Gary 'Nano' Pettit-Thompson IV
