
Season Review · September 29, 2025
A Season of Grit and Growth: Kenkridge’s Mid-Table Journey in Season 11
Ah, Kenkridge—SFC’s noble battlers in Division 8, navigating the treacherous waters of League 103 with a mix of resilience and room for improvement. Season 11 proved to be a rollercoaster, ending with a final position of 11th out of 22 teams. Not exactly a relegation scare, but certainly not a push for promotion either. With 5 wins, 5 draws, and 12 losses, the club amassed 20 points—an indication that while the team fought hard, consistency was elusive. Goals scored (25) and conceded (43) paint a picture of a side that struggled to find the net regularly and was often caught out at the back, culminating in a goal difference of -18.
Finished
11th
Points
20
Record
5-5-12
GD
-18

Gary 'Nano' Pettit-Thompson IV
Lead Football Journalist
The Match & Season Desk
Data-first, narrative-second. If it happened on the pitch, Gary filed it.
A Columns Desk filing — visual season centre first, then the full notebook.
Season Centre
The campaign in pictures — before the filing.
Position
11th
Points
20
Win Rate
23%
Games
22
Season profile
League-relative strengths
Percentile rank against clubs in the same league. Further out is stronger.
- Results
- 20
- P8
- Scoring
- 25
- P29
- Defence
- 43
- P29
- Goal difference
- -18
- P25
Campaign Record
5-5-12
Wins
5
23%
Draws
5
23%
Losses
12
55%
Attack · Defence
-18 GD
The Filing
Gary's notebook, desk by desk — with the forthcoming newsroom voices framed around the edges.
From Gary's Notebook
Season Overview
Filed by
Gary Nano
Ah, Kenkridge—SFC’s noble battlers in Division 8, navigating the treacherous waters of League 103 with a mix of resilience and room for improvement. Season 11 proved to be a rollercoaster, ending with a final position of 11th out of 22 teams. Not exactly a relegation scare, but certainly not a push for promotion either. With 5 wins, 5 draws, and 12 losses, the club amassed 20 points—an indication that while the team fought hard, consistency was elusive. Goals scored (25) and conceded (43) paint a picture of a side that struggled to find the net regularly and was often caught out at the back, culminating in a goal difference of -18.
Overall, Kenkridge’s season was a tale of battling against the odds, showing flashes of potential but hampered by defensive frailty and a need for more clinical finishing. The team’s possession average of 304.53% suggests they maintained a decent control of the ball, but possession alone doesn’t translate into results—it's what you do with that ball that counts.
Campaign Highlights
Season Highlights
Filed by
Gary Nano
While the season may not have been adorned with silverware or lofty league finishes, it was peppered with moments of promise. Notably, the team’s ability to secure draws—five of them—demonstrates a resilience that kept them afloat in many contests. These points often came from gritty performances where the team refused to capitulate, even when behind.
A key highlight was the home fixture against a top-tier side, where Kenkridge managed a surprising 1-1 draw, showcasing their defensive organization and fighting spirit. Additionally, their goal tally of 25, though modest, included some well-crafted team goals that hinted at a developing attacking philosophy. The squad’s perseverance was also evident in their ability to keep possession, often dictating play and frustrating opponents.
Standout Filings
Player Analysis
Filed by
Gary Nano
While specific top performers aren’t listed here, the season’s narrative suggests that players who contributed to the attack and midfield stability were crucial. The goal scorers likely chipped in with crucial strikes, and the midfielders’ ability to maintain possession was vital in controlling parts of the game. The defensive line, however, faced challenges, conceding 43 goals—an area ripe for improvement.
Given the possession stats, it’s safe to assume that the team’s playstyle leaned towards controlling the game, but perhaps lacked the cutting edge in front of goal or the defensive solidity to convert control into wins. The goal difference of -18 underscores this imbalance—possession and control are only half the story; finishing and defensive discipline are equally vital.
The Long View
Looking Ahead
Desk lens
The Ledger
Kenkridge’s season, while not spectacular, offers a foundation to build upon. The club’s resilience and possession-based approach suggest a team capable of competing at this level with targeted improvements. Focusing on defensive organization and sharpening attacking efficiency could see them climb the table in seasons to come. The squad’s development trajectory should aim for more consistency—turning draws into wins and minimizing defeats. With a few strategic signings and a focus on tactical discipline, SFC could well be eyeing a mid-table push or even a playoff challenge in the near future.
From the Columns Desk
Fun Facts
Filed by
Gary Nano
- Despite finishing 11th, Kenkridge’s possession percentage of 304.53% is notably high—indicating a possession-heavy style that perhaps lacked the final touch.
- The team scored 25 goals across 22 games, averaging just over 1 goal per game—a statistic that underscores their offensive struggles.
- Conceding 43 goals, the club’s defensive record was a significant hurdle, with an average of nearly 2 goals conceded per game.
- The goal difference of -18 is a clear indicator that while they could hold possession, converting that into results was a challenge.
- The balance of wins, draws, and losses (5-5-12) suggests a team that was often competitive but lacked the consistency to close out matches.
In sum, Season 11 for Kenkridge was a chapter of perseverance, with plenty of room for growth. The foundations are there—now it’s about sharpening the edges and turning potential into tangible success.
Gary 'Nano' Pettit-Thompson IV
